9/11/01.. Government Set-Up?

If I remember correctly, war means money in the economy, due to all the metal manufacterers, the vehicle/weapon factories, and everything else in that manner making a very nice profit, due to the government buying a lot of stuff to keep up the war effort.

High level corruption. Thinking of the US government as a coherent single entity is patently foolish. The executive branch is put into power to steal the public money and put it into the hands of a wealthy elite. This is exactly what wars and bailouts are all about.

 

[Milk Man]

...Im a little confused ..is this argument about whethere or not planes crashed into the towers..or if a terrorist crashed into them....

Cause if you are honestly saying no planes actually crashed into the towers then you are a fucking idiot!!!

And if you really think that the government killed innocent people to basically ruin or economy with this war then you are fucking dumb. My uncle died in the towers so I really don't want to think that the government sent a plane into the towers to cause millions of damage and over 2,000 lifes gone...

I've been reading that people feel they[government] did it so we had a reason to invade iraq...Well that would mean we would be there to get oil etc to make alot of money..good plan..But I pretty sure they would of known that all the compensation they have to pay is in the millions and know that people's health is affected by the smoke or whatever and they would never do that considering the pro's dont outway the con's..

Sorry for people who spend there lives trying to tell other people that the government is an agency who does everything to everyone on purpose..LMAO...Well why would they want to kill over 3,000 people when one of those person's could be the person who cures cancer? Or maybe fiND a way to make oil never ending? ..Yea FUCK WHO EVER THINKS THIS IS A CONSPERACY OR WHATEVER I TYPED THIS IN LIKE 2 MIN AND I THINK PEOPLE WHO THINK IT WASN'T A REAL ATTACK FROM TERRORISTS SHOULD GO KILL THEMSELVES..TY

 

Well why would they want to kill over 3,000 people when one of those person's could be the person who cures cancer? Or maybe fiND a way to make oil never ending? ..Yea FUCK WHO EVER THINKS THIS IS A CONSPERACY OR WHATEVER I TYPED THIS IN LIKE 2 MIN AND I THINK PEOPLE WHO THINK IT WASN'T A REAL ATTACK FROM TERRORISTS SHOULD GO KILL THEMSELVES..TY

A bit too much mercury in those shots they gave you perhaps?

What if one of the millions of innocent Iraqi or Afghan civilians your criminal government slaughtered after 9/11 had been that one person who would have gone on to cure cancer?

Are you going to deny your government willingly kills people?

 

[The Fat Controller]

Milk Man, I can tell you typed it in 2 minutes, and that you haven't thought it through properly... The government doesn't flinch at sending troops into danger and wasting billions, and they don't give a shit about people of other countries when they stand in the way of their goals.

 

[Milk Man]

Milk Man, I can tell you typed it in 2 minutes, and that you haven't thought it through properly... The government doesn't flinch at sending troops into danger and wasting billions, and they don't give a shit about people of other countries when they stand in the way of their goals.

before i get into this..tell me what you think happened on 9/11

did the government hire iraq's or w/e they were to hit into the towers?

did the towers really not get hit?

did the government get a robot to crash into the towers?

sry for poor typing im at work and im typing after each customer..trying to get my opinion out fast

 

[Milk Man]

A bit too much mercury in those shots they gave you perhaps?

What if one of the millions of innocent Iraqi or Afghan civilians your criminal government slaughtered after 9/11 had been that one person who would have gone on to cure cancer?

Are you going to deny your government willingly kills people?

i think you just basically agreed with me that 9/11 wasn't a set up no?

i said the government wouldnt kill random people like that..but since it REALLY WAS A TERRORIST THAT KILLED AMERICANS IT GIVES US THE RIGHT TO KILL THOSE FUCKERS BACK

 

[The Fat Controller]

before i get into this..tell me what you think happened on 9/11

did the government hire iraq's or w/e they were to hit into the towers?

did the towers really not get hit?

did the government get a robot to crash into the towers?

sry for poor typing im at work and im typing after each customer..trying to get my opinion out fast

No... read the thread sometime. Terrorists (mostly from Saudi Arabia) hijacked some planes and sent them flying into the twin towers. I'm just saying that your reasoning for why the government couldn't be responsible isn't good.

since it REALLY WAS A TERRORIST THAT KILLED AMERICANS IT GIVES US THE RIGHT TO KILL THOSE FUCKERS BACK

To be fair, the Iraq war had nothing to do with "killing the fuckers back".

 

[Milk Man]

No... read the thread sometime. Terrorists (mostly from Saudi Arabia) hijacked some planes and sent them flying into the twin towers. I'm just saying that your reasoning for why the government couldn't be responsible isn't good.



To be fair, the Iraq war had nothing to do with "killing the fuckers back".

kk i thought this whole section was saying that no terrorist crashed into the planes..as of the reason for crashing into the planes that i cannot really say..did the government help them into doing this..not really sure..

when i sore the title i thought it was saying that the government was behind the whole thing in that no human was flying the plane..

 

[Jesse]

kk i thought this whole section was saying that no terrorist crashed into the planes..as of the reason for crashing into the planes that i cannot really say..did the government help them into doing this..not really sure..

when i sore the title i thought it was saying that the government was behind the whole thing in that no human was flying the plane..

NOT SURE OF WHAT?

YOU'RE BASICALLY DENYING THE FUCKING FACT THAT A HUGE ASS EVENT HAPPENED OR NOT!

The government was behind the whole thing. That's why 11 of the hijackers were alive till the year 2007, until it got so much attention, some of them 'died in accidents' etc. You cannot be denying such an enormous amount of proof.
<_<
>_>
<_<

 

[Milk Man]

NOT SURE OF WHAT?

YOU'RE BASICALLY DENYING THE FUCKING FACT THAT A HUGE ASS EVENT HAPPENED OR NOT!

The government was behind the whole thing. That's why 11 of the hijackers were alive till the year 2007, until it got so much attention, some of them 'died in accidents' etc. You cannot be denying such an enormous amount of proof.
<_<
>_>
<_<

l0l???? you're saying the people that crashed into the towers jumped out lmao kk w/e you say nazi fuck...i bet your like a fucking irab or other foriegn piece of shit

This user has been forumbanned for this post
​

 

[Jay_0x]

l0l???? you're saying the people that crashed into the towers jumped out lmao kk w/e you say nazi fuck...i bet your like a fucking irab or other foriegn piece of shit

This user has been forumbanned for this post
​

Jesus kid, You have issues!

What the fuck? You call Jesse a nazi, then an "irab"?

Tell me... When you where younger, did you ever get dropped on your head?


Edit: Well done who ever banned him

 

[xx mdv xx]

l0l???? you're saying the people that crashed into the towers jumped out lmao kk w/e you say nazi fuck...i bet your like a fucking irab or other foriegn piece of shit

This user has been forumbanned for this post
​

11 terrorists are alive because they never boarded the plane, not because they used a parashoot lol. Anyways, it's believed to be a gov. set up because the Federal Reserve works with the government and the Federal Reserve makes money off of war because the government has to borrow money from the banks to buy weapons, but the Federal Reserve puts interest on that money.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912 explains how the federal reserve makes its money off of fake wars.

 

[LegitNamesCo]

A bit too much mercury in those shots they gave you perhaps?

What if one of the millions of innocent Iraqi or Afghan civilians your criminal government slaughtered after 9/11 had been that one person who would have gone on to cure cancer?

Are you going to deny your government willingly kills people?

There will never be a cure for cancer, because with a cure for cancer, lots and lots of people will lose their jobs.

 

[PinBuyer_]

How could you even say this?

 

[Black Marketeer]

Fallacy: ad hominem
Fallacy: appeal to authority

I'm sorry that you are all so thick about this.
Pick up a 10th greade physics textbook and start reading.
Read about Newtonian physics and thermodynamics.

A tenth grade physics student could give you a sound scientific rebuttal for the official story. It doesn't take a rocket scientist, it just takes a normal person with a normal capacity for independent thought and research.

Not necessarily, when you get into the architectural structure of the building, and how certain factors could have effected the structure, you would need someone skilled in that area. There are so many loop-holes to look at, you couldn't possibly call the legitimacy of this conspiracy theory solely on physics...

But seriously, you of all people aren't falling victim to an internet conspiracy theory video?

Reminds me of the 9/11 south park episode tbh.

There will never be a cure for cancer, because with a cure for cancer, lots and lots of people will lose their jobs.

I disagree, with the invention of robots and all sorts of technology people still find other jobs. For example, there would probably be an opening in jobs for people who distribute the cure for cancer. But that hurdle would have to be tackled once we reach it.

 

[Jesse]

l0l???? you're saying the people that crashed into the towers jumped out lmao kk w/e you say nazi fuck...i bet your like a fucking irab or other foriegn piece of shit

This user has been forumbanned for this post
​

No you dumb shit.

The people that they 'said' were on the plane, weren't. There was a fucking missile pod under the plane for fucks sake.

/edit

no point bastard is gone

 

Not necessarily, when you get into the architectural structure of the building, and how certain factors could have effected the structure, you would need someone skilled in that area. There are so many loop-holes to look at, you couldn't possibly call the legitimacy of this conspiracy theory solely on physics...

But seriously, you of all people aren't falling victim to an internet conspiracy theory video?

First, The official story IS a conspiracy theory. Half of the 11 hijackers have been confirmed to be still alive and well. The bushes and the binladens vacation together! Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11!

They don't even want to catch bin laden, because he is a CIA asset:
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42303

Secondly, structural engineering is a subset of physics. And it doesn't matter how buildings are designed, they still must obey the laws of physics.

The official story is in patent violation of both the laws of thermodynamics, and Newtonian physics, and in contradiction with the hard empirical evidence resulting from the intensive NIST recreations of the conditions in a controlled environment.

There is patently no excuse for maintaining an opinion about 9/11 without having done the research yourself.

The media LIES. They lied about bin laden, they lied about WMDs, they lied about the bailout bill. The people who run your government are not your friends. Don't you see this?

 

[The Fat Controller]

The bushes and the binladens vacation together!

You mean that in the past, the two rich families had business ties... Just what are you trying to suggest? That bin Laden was cooperating with the US Government?

They don't even want to catch bin laden, because he is a CIA asset:

They've certainly expended a lot of effort into actively trying to catch him, if that is the case.

Secondly, structural engineering is a subset of physics. And it doesn't matter how buildings are designed, they still must obey the laws of physics.

The official story is in patent violation of both the laws of thermodynamics, and Newtonian physics, and in contradiction with the hard empirical evidence resulting from the intensive NIST recreations of the conditions in a controlled environment.

Oh? So NIST agree that the US government blew up the twin towers too now, based on their hard empirical evidence? You've decided to turn into a "physicist", there's no point arguing with you further.

 

[Kiabin]

I believe it was a terrorist attack, but I don't know.

Watch this video, it's probably just coincidence.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6RhHDHDQfQ

Well, I do think it was a terrorist attack.

 

[FlubbyWubs]

All of them lack sufficient evidence.. in the beginning they may look that way, but when you pay attention to the key facts you will see that they are either false, or just not there