The Fat Controller
Guru
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 1
- Messages
- 1,003
Oh please. Some steel frame buildings literally explode and you insist that it was caused by fire, when a steel framed building has never collapsed in the history of the world due to fire. You insist this whilst providing no demonstrable physical mechanism.
1) Planes crash into towers. That is, this;
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/cgvlab/papers/popescu/popescuWTCVIS07.pdf
2) Fires weakened the remaining steel support columns around the impact point. The columns then either buckled under the pressure, or the connections of the floor trusses to the columns broke and dynamic loads led to a progressive collapse.
I also quote a brilliant bit of "basic physics" from this paper I've been reading:
Here: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/31114/61145960.pdf?sequence=1
See this side of the fence? This is the side on which the laws of physics are valid, my friend. You can stay in fairy land if you want. But you can't avoid metaphysical justice.
See the links above. Why are the laws of physics only valid on your side? Can I see some of the maths behind your reasoning, or peer-reviewed studies?
I also wonder why almost every scientist and engineer with relevant expertise is on my side. Maybe it's because they've been bought off by the government.
And in a year or two when there are black uniform police in your town, and riots and violence and general mayhem, you will remember this forum, and you will remember me. But by that time it will be too late. This is the price of your illusions: your life.
The price of me not believing that 9/11 was a conspiracy performed by the US government, with bin Laden in tow, will be my life?
























