Lol.... It was Usama Bin Laden ... Goverment set it LMFAO FUNNIEST THING IVE EVER HEARD U WATCH SOUTH PARK ALOT or something LOLS... again
Oh please, this bullshit again?
My uncle was on one of the planes that hit the world trade center, and these conspiracies are crap.
e: @ riiped, I don't know exactly if the government would be above that, but I really doubt they would do it all in a big attack. It's more likely the us would become a police state with secret prisons.
Listen dumies stop posting topics like this we all know it was a inside job fuck who ever that thinks its not..
listen this is 90% 13 year olds wtf do they know about real life, politics?
They didn't need to plant bombs in the towers to invade Iraq. It is not proven that there were explosives in the towers, and in fact there is evidence to the contrary which makes your version of events almost impossible.
The US could have just let Al Qaeda fly planes into them and leave it at that, why did they have to plant bombs too?![]()
actually the first plane they didnt know 45 min before, your getting it confused with united flight 93.
that plane they new like 45 min before, but they turned off all the radar systems.
so it was incredibly hard to track the plane.
i really dont think it was as easy to "takedown" those planes as you say
It's possible they did it to ensure the towers DID fall.
What difference would the towers falling have made? Planes had already crashed into them, which was more than enough to get the public scared enough to do anything the Bush Administration had in mind.
The whole idea of Al Qaeda flying planes into the twin towers and somehow working with the US government is mind-bogglingly stupid.
I never said that the US was working with them, but rather that the US had warning signs far before that and had a good reason (the war forces them to borrow from the central reserve which I'm pretty sure you know about, as well as quick access to oil.) Consider that with the demolition of the WTC centers, they could build a new - costly - center there.
It would have been a lot more convenient to let the towers fall (think about the families of the thousands of people that died; imagine their emotion when they learned that their friends / relatives / spouse / etc has just been killed by a bunch of terrorists who have conveniently been found alive in Al Qaeda.
Also, how do you explain WTC7 falling so perfectly? There were a FEW SMALL FIRES probably caused by debris or whatever, but there was no evidence to support anything CLOSE to a perfect collapse like that.
Oil, They're in iraq for Oil. Plain and simple.
They prooved there was explosives in the tower.
What difference would the towers falling have made? Planes had already crashed into them
How is that even relevant? If a new website came up in 20 years, with new facts and explanations to the 9/11 conspiracy, I would look into it as well. Turning your point 360 degrees; the conspiracy theories came flooding just days after the collapses, long before all of the facts were known.Jεsse;3659056 said:That's dumb.
That website was made May, 06 while 911 conspiracy facts were provided over 5 years ago and had websites running. It doesn't take that long unless you're trying to think of the most educated bullshit someone will by.

