Muslims.

No no no no no.

We're white, we can do whatever we want to, silly.

 

Australia is still in the early stages of muslim invasion.

You definitely do not want to visit England.

 

I live in a multicultural area, there is absolutely every race you could think of living here. You may not like it, but you have to get on with it.

 

It happens a religion or race will come and almost take over an area. Where i live you can't go anywhere without seeing spanish speaking fucks that starts fights with black/White people all damn day.

 

Well by this logic I guess we should all go kill trigger-happy, inconsiderate, douche-bags (such as yourself) before they pressure us into an all-white, non-ethnically diverse, bonded and enslaved world, right?

 

If the world is all white and non-ethnically diverse, who would be bonded and enslaved?

Are you trying to say that ridding the world of muslims would lead to a world free from slavery and bondage?

It's nice to see people supporting the view that muslims are a pest that needs to be controlled.

 

Nice attempt at an insult there, but I was being serious and provided valid reasoning behind my post. I know you're a child and all, but try and be a little more civil.

I never said anything about being pressured into a particular scenario, nor did I agree with the idea of an Aryan race, while that would be perfect, it won't happen with how uncontrollable we are as a race. But population control is necessary, valid, and useful. Wars are fought because of diversity, while they seem to be a cruel thing, they also provide a public service of reducing the number of people in the world, which is necessary at our current rate of growth.

 

Wtf are you talking about? The only difference between the meet is that the animals are killed quickly with a sharp knife so they dont feel any pain.

 

And reverse discrimination is just as bad.

 

Your idea is pretty much to have some people sacrificed/murdered for the benefit for the rest of the population. But the problem is that the people that are dieing can't benefit from population reduction. So pretty much a select few have to suffer a horrible death while the lucky get to live and produce more humans who will also have a chance of suffering a horrible death. Humanity isn't a group, a group doesn't exist, there are only individuals, which is why this idea is a fallacious one.

If you really believe in your philosophy then the most rational thing you can do is kill yourself right now and help control the population, otherwise you are a hypocrite for living while justifying the murder of other people for your own benefit.

 

Please don't stray from the subject matter proposed, an apparent invasion of Muslim influence wherever in Australia he lives.

Do not start off trying to misguide people into what you are writing, as Deacon Frost said, if it's racism, it's racism.

Taking over in what sense? Since i haven't heard of any direct hatred or infamy for the two communities being incompatible, I'm guessing it's not as much of a problem as you make it out to be.

As Haunted rightly said, the method of killing differs with the animal being blessed, then bleeding to death in what is seen as a more respectful death. The difference in taste is subjective, though in my opinion minimal. If the method of preparation is different (which it could be, seeing as with a growing culture, needs and opinions on taste would change) then I understand, but frankly otherwise there's nothing special about the taste of Halal meat.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewmckie/3695781/Youre_better_off_with_Halal_meat/

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090905045127AA7akQc

I highly doubt that these events you speak of are expressly condemned by Muslims, since Muslims are required to respect other religions. Unless these events were spiteful or in any way intended to cause offence to Muslims, I don't see how you can blame them for the closure of them.

This principle can exactly be applied to your whole argument, and in return, the Muslims could just say "if they don't like it, GTFO". Luckily, that isn't how most conflicts are solved, but rather started.

Using insults as a base for an argument will only get you infractions, and lose you respect.

 

I'm sure Muslims wouldn't mind be killed for the greater good. They would all be just fine with their 72 virgins in heaven.

 

Fast way to get banned newfag by insulting other peoples religions based on a false clause invented through propaganda campaign that Hindus created in the 60's and 70's which failed until reignited by Ariel Shannon in the 80's and 90's to launch a smud campaign against Islam.

 

Qur'an 55:72

""It was mentioned by Daraj Ibn Abi Hatim, that Abu al-Haytham 'Adullah Ibn Wahb narrated from Abu Sa'id al-Khudhri, who heard Muhammad saying, 'The smallest reward for the people of Heaven is an abode where there are eighty thousand servants and seventy-two houri, over which stands a dome decorated with pearls, aquamarine and ruby, as wide as the distance from al-Jabiyyah to San'a"

Also, do you mean Ariel Sharon?

 

Deacon Frost was right. I am a realist. Human Balance IS nesscary. Too much good, or too evil, leads to everyone's demise. Consider it.

 

Of course there is balance: that is the way of the world. That doesn't go to say that we should arbitrarily slaughter people.

 

they are also taking over in Britain.

 

Wow. I can't even begin to describe how fucking ignorant, racist, and stupid some people are in this thread. It's not even worth posting something worthwhile here.

Let's call this thread for what it is, a bash Islam thread. Honestly ignorant and rude shit like this should be locked. This kind of racist hatred shouldn't be allowed here.

 

Muslims are a religious group, not a race.

You don't choose what race you were born into, but since you can choose what you believe in, why should you be exempt from criticism?