Well, I've seen many great feedbacks about sin666, it's time to point out a negative action here.
http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=386650
V3nd3ta gets banned on the 25th of March, 2008,
A user called Straggler registers in September 2008.
Ban evades in other words.
He gets himself a good position, many many posts recieves UE spot as well, what not.
Then on the 16th of September 2009, posts an appeal, which Sin666 yesturday accepts since the person who was scammed managed to recover his losses.
My opinion:
Regardless of the fact whether the losses were covered or the V3nd3ta was hacked or what not, he ban evaded, which is against the rules.
I also believe that a rule that keeps some users banned, should keep all users banned.
Both accounts should be banned for ban evading, I've seen many cases similar to this where the person was hacked got banned ban evaded then got banned for ban evading. This case shouldn't differ either.
http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=386650
V3nd3ta gets banned on the 25th of March, 2008,
A user called Straggler registers in September 2008.
Ban evades in other words.
He gets himself a good position, many many posts recieves UE spot as well, what not.
Then on the 16th of September 2009, posts an appeal, which Sin666 yesturday accepts since the person who was scammed managed to recover his losses.
My opinion:
Regardless of the fact whether the losses were covered or the V3nd3ta was hacked or what not, he ban evaded, which is against the rules.
I also believe that a rule that keeps some users banned, should keep all users banned.
Both accounts should be banned for ban evading, I've seen many cases similar to this where the person was hacked got banned ban evaded then got banned for ban evading. This case shouldn't differ either.








