Fact is objective, interpretation and presentation is subjective.
That is where your logic is flawed. Interpretation and presentation, a basis to any fact other than (sub)conscious fact, is key to making the fact plausible. In this case, what shapes the fact decides whether or not it is objective or subjective. This was my argument. It is valid, and therefore, apposing arguments aren't.
The thread is leeching off of truth that is presented, not conscious or sub-conscious concepts.




