Defeated List:
dam prayer noobs (coming soon)
Music Makes Me Pwn
phr0z3n
Billyy
sms100
Wendy
There's more, but my mind decays as the number increases, and time moves forward.
Will never happen
Did it for the lulz
- Thread starter dam prayer noobs
- Start date
Will never happen
oolol. Expect a hard battle, that may last for a long time.
Nah after a while he's just gonna be like "Ok sunshine, I have some tea and crumpets waiting for me at my boyfriend's house. Good riddance."
Finn be rapage at insult fights =o
/not sarcasm ngr's
/not sarcasm ngr's
I do admit though, none of my other competitors came even close to being as eloquent or as masterful in the art of syntax as Finn is.
It will be a good battle.
It will be a good battle.
Stereotyping is for those who can't argue properly.
It's like me resorting to something as pathetic as ''all emerickens r fat n eet lots of burgors''.
However, I wouldn't resort to that, as I'd never exhibit myself stooping to such low and lurid levels as you have just done.
Finally, I'd just like to point out that there is some inaccuracy in the 'crumpet' claim, as you'll find that British people eat crumpets less than frequently. Personally speaking, around once a year.
Apart from the stereotyping, that was a reasonable attempt.
Well done, you sanctimonious little maestro.
Stereotyping is for those who can't argue properly.
It's like me resorting to something as pathetic as ''all emerickens r fat n eet lots of burgors''.
However, I wouldn't resort to that, as I'd never exhibit myself stooping to such low and lurid levels as you have just done.
Finally, I'd just like to point out that there is some inaccuracy in the 'crumpet' claim, as you'll find that British people eat crumpets less than frequently. Personally speaking, around once a year.
Apart from the stereotyping, that was a reasonable attempt.
Well done, you sanctimonious little maestro.
As you should know, that was just a little something to get things started. And since it was a starter, I was not engaged in an argument with you at the time I posted that. But the argument started with the above post so the statement "Stereotyping is for those who can't argue properly" is invalid.
The point of stereotyping is to make a generalization about a certain culture or society. So it was imperative that there be an inaccuracy in my statement.
And I would like to give out a big round of applause to Fouisgras for clearing the Faces of Sythe thread of your garbage. I was getting quite sick of you flaming everyone who at least had the balls to post their own picture, while you have not even posted your own.
Because you refuted the above statement before with "I have the right to critisize" bullshit, let me put that into a little analogy for you. People post their own pictures. Then you go ridicule them. But then these people that you are ridiculing do not even have a chance to make fun of you, since your picture is absent from the thread. Therefore I have no choice but to classify you as a coward, a "bloody coward."
Lol.
Wendy was not defeated... >_>
You seem to be quite the assumptive type, disregarding what may be an inability to post a photograph.
Perhaps I had half of my face incinerated by a raging and furious forest fire and am trying to make myself feel better by criticizing other peoples photos.
At the end of the day, that's not the point. I've been asked not to post any more aggressive opinions in the thread, so I shall not do so.
Oh, and of the inaccuracy in the stereotypical claim. If you're going to confess to an inaccuracy in what seemed to be an attempted insult, you should try and abstain from using such insults in future. Inaccuracies in insults don't really go too well together, and unless you're really making a go for the ''pretentious and ignorant'' view on other nations, you best follow my advice, buster.
Re-reading your quote I've noticed you dragged something entirely different into the bravado, which is questionable. What were your intentions?
Oh, and to conclude this sensational charade, I have no choice but to classify you an assumptive, aversive, insolent, virulent hazard.
Firstly, I'll correct you there.
It's pompous*.
Pompous I am, yes.
Secondly, you seemed to have conjured quite a few opinions over the very short time you have been prowling the site. Begging the question: who - and rather what - are you, exactly?
Oh, and dam prayer noobs, this is what I consider flaming.
Reported.
Did you suddenly have a shining ember of curiosity and decide to ferret around the internet looking for a definition?
Well done. See, you're improving already. A little bit of motivation goes a long way, evidently.
How is it possible to not assume on the internet? I am sorry that I cannot read your mind and know the true cause of why you have not posted a picture. But your infinite wisdom seems to be missing a simple understanding of probability. I have no doubt in my mind that if a new kid came on here you would most likely think he is a guy (and this is an assumption itself), but there is that infinitesimal possibility that it could be a girl.
About your picture, almost everyone on this forum has the ability to take a picture,upload it on their computer and post it on here. The possibility that someone is not able to do this is tiny to me, too tiny for me to take account of it. So naturally I don't pay attention to it, like most people do with the guy/girl example.
Finn, you also assumed that all I do is go around making fun of other peoples' nationalities and cultures from my first statement. Like I explained before, it was simply a little insult to get things started. And now the argument has begun but you are still elaborating about how I stereotype and that makes me ignorant. I think YOU should follow my advise and deviate from your false impression of me and think of something else, or do you have nothing else to talk about? Punk.
To infer from the above statements, I conclude that you are a bloody, vulgar, atrocious (many more pointless words that make me look intelligent) hypocrite.
And Clank, please do not assist me in this argument as you are making me look bad and as if I need help, which I don't. And I am the "loser" that made the defeated list, Finn made one after me, which is the one I quoted.
Finn I have to do school work, studying for AP exams, etc. I will reply to your future post tomorrow or later tonight if I lose interest in studying.
This thread is faggotry. Just because it's the spam forum, doesn't entitle you to start 2v1 attacking mr. finn.
As a side note, dam prayer noobs!
As a side note, dam prayer noobs!
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2008
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 1,608
Thanks for the correction.
The assumption that I have been on the site could well be wrong, even though it says so next to my name, what kind of proof is that?
Regarding 'what' I am, do you really have the right to ask what I am?
The correct question is - What are you? You portray yourself as a zombie, a zombie pyromaniac infact, you obviously did not think those two concept's out correctly, seeing as zombies are dead, dry 'life-forms', a pyromaniac zombie would not be a sucessful combination.
The assumption that I have been on the site could well be wrong, even though it says so next to my name, what kind of proof is that?
Regarding 'what' I am, do you really have the right to ask what I am?
The correct question is - What are you? You portray yourself as a zombie, a zombie pyromaniac infact, you obviously did not think those two concept's out correctly, seeing as zombies are dead, dry 'life-forms', a pyromaniac zombie would not be a sucessful combination.
b1b
Guru
no u..
