i HAVE posted this topic before but figured i might as well get SOMETHING started in here sooooooooo
Ok, first lets begin with the definition of Euthanasia,
Now lets for example take a person who is physically incapable of moving and their last wish is that the life they are forced to live where they can do nothing but think, cannot express opinions, speak, move or anything else. They express at some point in their life in a written/signed document that if they are physically incapacitated that they should be killed. This is that persons own wishes and yet it is illegal.
A person dealing with a terminal disease who is in that much pain that even painkillers cannot help them. They ask for someone to please put them out of the misery they are suffering because it is a constant pain so excruciating that they are in and out of consciousness every couple of minutes. Surely if they so wish to be killed to be out of this pain it is for their own good and THEY did concent to it.
In both of these circumstances the person would be unable to kill themselves as they can barely move. And if they have both agreed to it then why cant a person get them a lethal injection or any other type of drug which will not hurt but simply put them to sleep.
I believe that it should only be allowed if the chance f survival is under 15% and the person has consented to it CLEARLY and it has been witnessed by a lawyer or official of the law. They may then be attended too by a PROPPER nurse who would be trained to do this thus meaning that people do NOT have to take it upon themselves to kill their friends. But rather they can organise for it too all be done legitimately.
Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES is another person allowed to be killed however unless you have their direct consent. No-one can make the decision for them so if they are unable to signal in any way then unfortunately they would have to be left to die.
Do you think that in the ABOVE described circumstances Euthanasia should be legalised?? what is your viewpoints on it?
Ok, first lets begin with the definition of Euthanasia,
Now lets for example take a person who is physically incapable of moving and their last wish is that the life they are forced to live where they can do nothing but think, cannot express opinions, speak, move or anything else. They express at some point in their life in a written/signed document that if they are physically incapacitated that they should be killed. This is that persons own wishes and yet it is illegal.
A person dealing with a terminal disease who is in that much pain that even painkillers cannot help them. They ask for someone to please put them out of the misery they are suffering because it is a constant pain so excruciating that they are in and out of consciousness every couple of minutes. Surely if they so wish to be killed to be out of this pain it is for their own good and THEY did concent to it.
In both of these circumstances the person would be unable to kill themselves as they can barely move. And if they have both agreed to it then why cant a person get them a lethal injection or any other type of drug which will not hurt but simply put them to sleep.
I believe that it should only be allowed if the chance f survival is under 15% and the person has consented to it CLEARLY and it has been witnessed by a lawyer or official of the law. They may then be attended too by a PROPPER nurse who would be trained to do this thus meaning that people do NOT have to take it upon themselves to kill their friends. But rather they can organise for it too all be done legitimately.
Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES is another person allowed to be killed however unless you have their direct consent. No-one can make the decision for them so if they are unable to signal in any way then unfortunately they would have to be left to die.
Do you think that in the ABOVE described circumstances Euthanasia should be legalised?? what is your viewpoints on it?
