The accuser attempted a scam

There is a major contradiction that proves the entire report is fabricated.

https://i.gyazo.com/0823ce1e35274530a3e338379606e6a1.jpg

The reporter claims:

He opened a ticket at 3:18 PM

Spoke to my “Assistant”

Paid 80$

Got banned

And I “scammed” him

However…

I have official logs showing the exact same person, with the same Discord ID, at:

https://i.gyazo.com/08dc88ac51ffebbeadbf349b71ad6ba3.jpg

https://i.gyazo.com/39de24f4364aa6e1fb4ed5312695ce53.png


https://i.gyazo.com/850a05b980352c03ef36bdc7fd8c24e0.png


1:21 AM (hours BEFORE his claimed ticket)


At that time, he was:

Opening dozens of spam tickets

Swearing at staff

Harassing the server

Not cooperating, not asking for any service

And absolutely NOT behaving like a staff member

So I ask one simple question:

How can this person be an “Assistant” in my server at 3:18 PM

while at 1:21 AM he was spamming, insulting, and attacking the server?


No service owner on earth would ever hire someone who:

Spams the ticket system

Harasses staff

Insults the server

Creates chaos

And attacks the team

This alone proves he was never an assistant.

He simply edited Discord screenshots to pretend he was staff in order to stage a fake conversation.

How is somebody not staff allowed in your ticket?

Rs Prime said:

There is a major contradiction that proves the entire report is fabricated.

https://i.gyazo.com/0823ce1e35274530a3e338379606e6a1.jpg

The reporter claims:

He opened a ticket at 3:18 PM

Spoke to my “Assistant”

Paid 80$

Got banned

And I “scammed” him

However…

I have official logs showing the exact same person, with the same Discord ID, at:

https://i.gyazo.com/08dc88ac51ffebbeadbf349b71ad6ba3.jpg

https://i.gyazo.com/39de24f4364aa6e1fb4ed5312695ce53.png


https://i.gyazo.com/850a05b980352c03ef36bdc7fd8c24e0.png


1:21 AM (hours BEFORE his claimed ticket)


At that time, he was:

Opening dozens of spam tickets

Swearing at staff

Harassing the server

Not cooperating, not asking for any service

And absolutely NOT behaving like a staff member

So I ask one simple question:

How can this person be an “Assistant” in my server at 3:18 PM

while at 1:21 AM he was spamming, insulting, and attacking the server?


No service owner on earth would ever hire someone who:

Spams the ticket system

Harasses staff

Insults the server

Creates chaos

And attacks the team

This alone proves he was never an assistant.

He simply edited Discord screenshots to pretend he was staff in order to stage a fake conversation.

Click to expand...

All im seeing is that the person that scammed me (your staff) was given assistant and scammed me.

Foreign Agent said:

Watch prime scam | Streamable

Click to expand...

Why does the video get blurred from 0:35 till 0:48?

BlackBlasses said:

Why does the video get blurred from 0:35 till 0:48?

Click to expand...

Switched to personal information

This has taken way too long. First, is the first video correct? The one without any assistant? Or the second video?


https://i.gyazo.com/83adf021a17a7893fce09c7dd6a801b0.png

I see that the first video shows the entire Discord interface, while the second one doesn't. Everyone can watch the first video and see the difference between it and the second video after adding the assistant.

Can someone explain why the video is blurred?

Can someone explain why the assistant suddenly disappeared again in the second part of the video? 0:48

Can anyone explain any of this nonsense? It's very obvious to everyone.

Rs Prime said:

This has taken way too long. First, is the first video correct? The one without any assistant? Or the second video?

https://i.gyazo.com/83adf021a17a7893fce09c7dd6a801b0.png

I see that the first video shows the entire Discord interface, while the second one doesn't. Everyone can watch the first video and see the difference between it and the second video after adding the assistant.

Can someone explain why the video is blurred?

Can someone explain why the assistant suddenly disappeared again in the second part of the video? 0:48

Can anyone explain any of this nonsense? It's very obvious to everyone.

Click to expand...

The second clip i sent clearly shows him in ticket then for some reason you removed him?

Probably because i sent the money lol and you are a scammer

You say YOURSELF. He was given assistant why do you keep changing your story?

https://i.imgur.com/D1IKGHl.png

Notes:

- The accuser's IP address

- The ticket

- The video/Gauchos

- Spamming from the accuser:
Why did the accused open multiple tickets prior to the alleged scam, which the accused described as spam?
- Why wasn't the accuser removed from the server for spamming?

- The BTC payment

- Reign of Terror (ROT) lead
/

I would like to note that it is evident that an account named "Gauchos" existed and held a staff role on the Discord server in question.
It also appears to me that the ticket in question was real. As I was given a developer role in the server, I will review this further. However, it seems that this was fully staged by someone, and no actual scam occurred.

I have applied a DNT to the accuser pending the report.


@Rs Prime, how did Gaucho acquire a staff role on the server?
The accused, Rs Prime, claims that he acquired it through a bug. Can you elaborate on that?
- Why wasn't Gaucho removed from the server after he misbehaved by spamming?
- Why wasn't the accuser removed from the server for spamming?
- Can you confirm or deny the existence of the ticket where the alleged scam took place?

@Foreign Agent, what is your relationship with the Reign of Terror and Violent Resolution clans?

I would like both of you to be honest with me. Lying in the report may result in a punishment.

-BlackBlasses

BlackBlasses said:

Notes:

- The accuser's IP address

- The report was posted from a home IP address.
- The IP address matches the user's usual geolocation.
- The account does not appear to be compromised.​

- The ticket

- There is no mention of stats, gear, or prayers.
- There is no mention of the method (login/parsec).
- There is no mention of time availability or time frame.
- Straight to the price.
$80 is potentially a high price in the current market depending on other factors.
The accused does not have a set price, which could potentially be edited after the report.
https://i.ibb.co/PS0bFrb/image.png
- No price negotiations.
- No questions asked.​

- The video/Gauchos

- Server representative "Gauchos" was not listed in the members list in the first video provided by the accuser in the report.
- The accused pointed this out in the report.
- The accuser posted a screenshot of a ticket in which Gauchos was listed as a member.
- The accused posted a screenshot of the logs showing that Gaucho was given a staff role: https://i.ibb.co/k659ybT9/image.png.

- This proves that an account named Gaucho was on the accused's server and had a staff role, which contradicts the claim that Gaucho was photoshopped in.
- It is possible that Gaucho was removed from the server or had his staff role removed before the video was recorded.​

- Gaucho appears in the second video posted by the Accused. Then, the video is blurred for 13 seconds. After the blur is removed, Gaucho is no longer in the ticket.
- Why is there a blur? This was seemingly added in.
- How did Gaucho acquire a staff role on the server?
The accused claims that Gaucho was opening multiple tickets, spamming, swearing, and accusing staff of scamming and botting, allegedly hours before the alleged scam took place.

- Why was Gaucho not removed from the server after his misconduct?​

- Spamming from the accuser:
Why did the accused open multiple tickets prior to the alleged scam, which the accused described as spam?
- Why wasn't the accuser removed from the server for spamming?

- The BTC payment

- Transaction link: Transaction: 4767a1257f5caf0897b3568e9ac46c3970d0e175e4ced78f00394a97b07fe2dd | Blockchain.com
- The recipient's address: bc1qu3ktqlcwwar2ne53kxazds8zv4kxlgf35zuhtd
- The address received only one transaction.
- Servers commonly do not rotate addresses.
- The server is new; it could be the first BTC payment.
- The transaction was seemingly posted from an exchange.
- The time in the ticket when the accused says, "ok i sent," and is subsequently removed from the server is xx:26
- The transaction was broadcast to the blockchain at xx:32 and confirmed at xx:38 on November 24th at 12:38 a.m. UTC+1 (38 minutes after midnight).​

- Reign of Terror (ROT) lead

- The accused party provided screenshots of threats from an alleged ROT representative hours before the report.
- In those threats, the accused was asked to cancel advertisement agreements with a competing clan, Violent Resolution (VR).
- The reason was an alleged DOXing of ROT members by VR.
- ROT is known for "toxic" stunts.
- An alleged VR representative provided evidence of ROT's threats to multiple "sponsors" and advertisers in their server.

​

/

I would like to note that it is evident that an account named "Gauchos" existed and held a staff role on the Discord server in question.
It also appears to me that the ticket in question was real. As I was given a developer role in the server, I will review this further. However, it seems that this was fully staged by someone, and no actual scam occurred.

I have applied a DNT to the accuser pending the report.


@Rs Prime, how did Gaucho acquire a staff role on the server?
The accused, Rs Prime, claims that he acquired it through a bug. Can you elaborate on that?
- Why wasn't Gaucho removed from the server after he misbehaved by spamming?
- Why wasn't the accuser removed from the server for spamming?
- Can you confirm or deny the existence of the ticket where the alleged scam took place?

@Foreign Agent, what is your relationship with the Reign of Terror and Violent Resolution clans?

I would like both of you to be honest with me. Lying in the report may result in a punishment.

-BlackBlasses

Click to expand...

I have no relationship with RoT or VR.

Was simply looking for an inferno cape as i saw they were doing those. I should've put more thought into thinking about how quick it was but I'm not that familiar with trading practises and thought it would've been normal for me to go first. Although I did think it was odd that I got a PC very quickly.

My issue is that you guys are saying its staged?

I can't see how i would be able to stage this within 9 minutes. In the picture it says 1:15am he was given the rank and then 9 minutes later the ticket was open and i was scammed.

1. Why is somebody who was spamming and accusing them of scamming having an admin rank?

3. Why wasn't he banned prior to this but only after the money was sent?

@Foreign Agent why did you open multiple tickets - which was described as "spamming" by the accused and I would agree with that claim - prior to the one where you inquired about an Infernal Cape?

BlackBlasses said:

@Foreign Agent why did you open multiple tickets - which was described as "spamming" by the accused and I would agree with that claim - prior to the one where you inquired about an Infernal Cape?

Click to expand...

I wasn't getting a response in any other ticket.

Foreign Agent said:

I wasn't getting a response in any other ticket.

Click to expand...

Do you think your explanation is convincing? You opened multiple tickets crazily within the same minute — 1:27 AM.

Rs Prime said:

Do you think your explanation is convincing? You opened multiple tickets crazily within the same minute — 1:27 AM.

Click to expand...

how did Gaucho acquire a staff role on the server?
The accused, Rs Prime, claims that he acquired it through a bug. Can you elaborate on that?
- Why wasn't Gaucho removed from the server after he misbehaved by spamming?
- Why wasn't the accuser removed from the server for spamming?
- Can you confirm or deny the existence of the ticket where the alleged scam took place?

BlackBlasses said:

Notes:

- The accuser's IP address

- The report was posted from a home IP address.
- The IP address matches the user's usual geolocation.
- The account does not appear to be compromised.​

- The ticket

- There is no mention of stats, gear, or prayers.
- There is no mention of the method (login/parsec).
- There is no mention of time availability or time frame.
- Straight to the price.
$80 is potentially a high price in the current market depending on other factors.
The accused does not have a set price, which could potentially be edited after the report.
https://i.ibb.co/PS0bFrb/image.png
- No price negotiations.
- No questions asked.​

- The video/Gauchos

- Server representative "Gauchos" was not listed in the members list in the first video provided by the accuser in the report.
- The accused pointed this out in the report.
- The accuser posted a screenshot of a ticket in which Gauchos was listed as a member.
- The accused posted a screenshot of the logs showing that Gaucho was given a staff role: https://i.ibb.co/k659ybT9/image.png.

- This proves that an account named Gaucho was on the accused's server and had a staff role, which contradicts the claim that Gaucho was photoshopped in.
- It is possible that Gaucho was removed from the server or had his staff role removed before the video was recorded.​

- Gaucho appears in the second video posted by the Accused. Then, the video is blurred for 13 seconds. After the blur is removed, Gaucho is no longer in the ticket.
- Why is there a blur? This was seemingly added in.
- How did Gaucho acquire a staff role on the server?
The accused claims that Gaucho was opening multiple tickets, spamming, swearing, and accusing staff of scamming and botting, allegedly hours before the alleged scam took place.

- Why was Gaucho not removed from the server after his misconduct?​

- Spamming from the accuser:
Why did the accused open multiple tickets prior to the alleged scam, which the accused described as spam?
- Why wasn't the accuser removed from the server for spamming?

- The BTC payment

- Transaction link: Transaction: 4767a1257f5caf0897b3568e9ac46c3970d0e175e4ced78f00394a97b07fe2dd | Blockchain.com
- The recipient's address: bc1qu3ktqlcwwar2ne53kxazds8zv4kxlgf35zuhtd
- The address received only one transaction.
- Servers commonly do not rotate addresses.
- The server is new; it could be the first BTC payment.
- The transaction was seemingly posted from an exchange.
- The time in the ticket when the accused says, "ok i sent," and is subsequently removed from the server is xx:26
- The transaction was broadcast to the blockchain at xx:32 and confirmed at xx:38 on November 24th at 12:38 a.m. UTC+1 (38 minutes after midnight).​

- Reign of Terror (ROT) lead

- The accused party provided screenshots of threats from an alleged ROT representative hours before the report.
- In those threats, the accused was asked to cancel advertisement agreements with a competing clan, Violent Resolution (VR).
- The reason was an alleged DOXing of ROT members by VR.
- ROT is known for "toxic" stunts.
- An alleged VR representative provided evidence of ROT's threats to multiple "sponsors" and advertisers in their server.

​

/

I would like to note that it is evident that an account named "Gauchos" existed and held a staff role on the Discord server in question.
It also appears to me that the ticket in question was real. As I was given a developer role in the server, I will review this further. However, it seems that this was fully staged by someone, and no actual scam occurred.

I have applied a DNT to the accuser pending the report.


@Rs Prime, how did Gaucho acquire a staff role on the server?
The accused, Rs Prime, claims that he acquired it through a bug. Can you elaborate on that?
- Why wasn't Gaucho removed from the server after he misbehaved by spamming?
- Why wasn't the accuser removed from the server for spamming?
- Can you confirm or deny the existence of the ticket where the alleged scam took place?

@Foreign Agent, what is your relationship with the Reign of Terror and Violent Resolution clans?

I would like both of you to be honest with me. Lying in the report may result in a punishment.

-BlackBlasses

Click to expand...

--------------------------------

I would like to explain everything as clearly as possible:

**how did Gaucho acquire a staff role on the server?


I didn't give him any role on the team, and I never promoted him if he had access. This was either due to:
-A Discord glitch.
-A Carl Bott glitch.

**Why wasn't Gaucho removed from the server after he misbehaved by spamming?

**Why wasn't the accuser removed from the server for spamming?

Gaucho and others were opening multiple tickets simultaneously, and we were trying to close them all as quickly as possible. He and several others were indeed banned.

At the time, I wasn't aware he was sending spam or causing problems because I wasn't at my computer. If I had seen it, it would have all stopped immediately. The moderation team doesn't have the authority to remove or penalize members.
When we were closing all the tickets, we were deleting some and saving others without looking at anything except stopping this nonsense.

The accuser wasn't removed because I didn't have administrative privileges to ban or remove members. At the time, I wasn't at my computer and wasn't aware of all the messages being sent.
The situation was complicated because many members, including the accuser, were exploiting a glitch or timing issue to open multiple tickets at once, resulting in a massive influx of tickets. While we were trying to close and manage these tickets, some were deleted, while others were saved for review. During this process, the claimant's actions were part of this coordinated disruption.
It's important to note that the server was undergoing updates, and role permissions were still being configured in the new server setup. Therefore, I was unable to delete or block the claimant because I was away when I received a phone call informing me of what was happening. I immediately went to the server and tried to stop it.


***Can you confirm or deny the existence of the ticket where the alleged scam took place?
Regarding the ticket, it is proven by the attached videos from the plaintiff on the right of the screen that he opened more than one ticket at the same time (this is part of his planned operation), and this is also to create confusion in any place and any ticket for him and his colleagues to commit their crime. Therefore, as I mentioned before, due to the large number of tickets and spam, we were closing any ticket that was opened without looking at saving it or removing it. However, we have more than one ticket for this name that does not contain any texts at all because we were trying to close it immediately without responding.
- I am fully cooperating and ready to provide any details needed. -





https://i.gyazo.com/ed000d932ba669a8defb075e9dc082db.png



https://i.gyazo.com/e6867b4460c0e02b17f1d7c61c576213.png

Regarding the alleged scam, the workflow and payment verification process require multiple steps

(payment command, confirmation, verification) that did not happen as described.

The tickets you mentioned were not processed in that manner,

and the screenshots and timeline provided in the claim are inconsistent with the actual procedures.

The Audit Log , i think can`t edited or something like that if this will help with anything



https://i.gyazo.com/51161ca3a250f82401a705cd7828134a.png

BlackBlasses said:

Notes:

- The accuser's IP address

- The report was posted from a home IP address.
- The IP address matches the user's usual geolocation.
- The account does not appear to be compromised.​

- The ticket

- There is no mention of stats, gear, or prayers.
- There is no mention of the method (login/parsec).
- There is no mention of time availability or time frame.
- Straight to the price.
$80 is potentially a high price in the current market depending on other factors.
The accused does not have a set price, which could potentially be edited after the report.
https://i.ibb.co/PS0bFrb/image.png
- No price negotiations.
- No questions asked.​

- The video/Gauchos

- Server representative "Gauchos" was not listed in the members list in the first video provided by the accuser in the report.
- The accused pointed this out in the report.
- The accuser posted a screenshot of a ticket in which Gauchos was listed as a member.
- The accused posted a screenshot of the logs showing that Gaucho was given a staff role: https://i.ibb.co/k659ybT9/image.png.

- This proves that an account named Gaucho was on the accused's server and had a staff role, which contradicts the claim that Gaucho was photoshopped in.
- It is possible that Gaucho was removed from the server or had his staff role removed before the video was recorded.​

- Gaucho appears in the second video posted by the Accused. Then, the video is blurred for 13 seconds. After the blur is removed, Gaucho is no longer in the ticket.
- Why is there a blur? This was seemingly added in.
- How did Gaucho acquire a staff role on the server?
The accused claims that Gaucho was opening multiple tickets, spamming, swearing, and accusing staff of scamming and botting, allegedly hours before the alleged scam took place.

- Why was Gaucho not removed from the server after his misconduct?​

- Spamming from the accuser:
Why did the accused open multiple tickets prior to the alleged scam, which the accused described as spam?
- Why wasn't the accuser removed from the server for spamming?

- The BTC payment

- Transaction link: Transaction: 4767a1257f5caf0897b3568e9ac46c3970d0e175e4ced78f00394a97b07fe2dd | Blockchain.com
- The recipient's address: bc1qu3ktqlcwwar2ne53kxazds8zv4kxlgf35zuhtd
- The address received only one transaction.
- Servers commonly do not rotate addresses.
- The server is new; it could be the first BTC payment.
- The transaction was seemingly posted from an exchange.
- The time in the ticket when the accused says, "ok i sent," and is subsequently removed from the server is xx:26
- The transaction was broadcast to the blockchain at xx:32 and confirmed at xx:38 on November 24th at 12:38 a.m. UTC+1 (38 minutes after midnight).​

- Reign of Terror (ROT) lead

- The accused party provided screenshots of threats from an alleged ROT representative hours before the report.
- In those threats, the accused was asked to cancel advertisement agreements with a competing clan, Violent Resolution (VR).
- The reason was an alleged DOXing of ROT members by VR.
- ROT is known for "toxic" stunts.
- An alleged VR representative provided evidence of ROT's threats to multiple "sponsors" and advertisers in their server.

​

/

I would like to note that it is evident that an account named "Gauchos" existed and held a staff role on the Discord server in question.
It also appears to me that the ticket in question was real. As I was given a developer role in the server, I will review this further. However, it seems that this was fully staged by someone, and no actual scam occurred.

I have applied a DNT to the accuser pending the report.

Click to expand...

I have extensively reviewed the logs, transcripts and channels.

Foreign Agent said:

I wasn't getting a response in any other ticket.

Click to expand...

@Foreign Agent, the logs also show that you opened a lot of tickets.
Due to the number of tickets you created, combined with spam from other Discord accounts during this time and other factors indicating an attempted scam on your part, I find your reasoning implausible.

Based on the evidence provided, I conclude that the accuser, @Foreign Agent, attempted to scam @Rs Prime, and I have issued a one-month ban.

@Foreign Agent, If you disagree with my decision, you are free to open a dispute and a different staff member will review the case - Dispute a Ban, DNT or TWC
Note that you can post as a guest, do not create a new account.
Otherwise, you are free to Request a Pardon.




@Rs Prime, it's concerning that a malicious actor could assign a staff role through Carl Bot.
Additonally, by manually deleting channels instead of using a ticket command, you deleted plenty of tickets, including the one in question - you deleted the evidence.
Given the absurd amount of spam you received and the highly stressful situation you were in, I don't necessarily think this was done maliciously on your end.

However, due to your gross oversight, I believe a TWC is in order.
You may dispute the TWC in a month.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Best regards,
BlackBlasses