Make a Lending Fourm?

[Platypi]

The majority of services we see in the 'Other Services' is Account Lending services now that Staking is out. Perhaps we can combine Account and Item Lending services into one forum called 'Lending services', as the section Item Lending services is rarely used compared to other Market Sections.
EDIT: I meant to say Lending Section my apologies

 

[n4n0]

I don't see any reason against merging this with item lending. It would bring more activity to the section.

 

[Ricky]

Already made but not used enough.

http://sythe.org/forumdisplay.php?f=455

 

[Platypi]

Already made but not used enough.

http://sythe.org/forumdisplay.php?f=455

I think you misunderstood my post, I was talking about merging Item Lending with Account Lending to make a Lending Section. It would bring more activity to that Section as the Item Lending section is the most dead out of all the Services.

 

[Chiilii8]

What's point lending? Make your own by yourself. Don't being like as lazy!

 

[JstarD]

Good idea, support

 

[oblivion9032]

Perhaps even just moving it so it can be seen more will bring more attention and activity to it.

 

[SSJ4 Gogeta]

User services< Other services

 

[matthias]

Lending Fourm?

 

[Platypi]

What's point lending? Make your own by yourself. Don't being like as lazy!

Irrelevant to the subject don&#8217;t try to raise post count contributing nothing to the topic.

Good idea, support

Must explain why, its considered spam if you don&#8217;t explain the reason why you support.

User services< Other services

You do realize that Other Services is part of User Services?

Lending Fourm?

Stop spamming, if you actually took 10 seconds to read the original post you would be aware that I made a mistake

 

Look at all of these effing idiots. I really hate most of this post whore community.
Anyways, I see a problem with it... it'd just be more unclear.
Accounts and items would have to be separated in the title and it would just be very confusing... so I like how it is.

 

[Adrian Ochoa]

I agree...altho it would make market section a bit more lively

 

[Rsaccounttrader]

Account lending is dangerous; there are ways to automatically change recovery questions...

 

[Platypi]

Account lending is dangerous; there are ways to automatically change recovery questions...

Accounts are usually lended for staking or 'renting'. They're rented from Users for any time period from an hour to 24 hours. They're rarely scams that happen when renting out accounts for staking as they usually on charge 1mil an hour or 5mil for 24 hours. They're quite a few trusted users who make their accounts available for rental and I have seen no real issue yet.

 

[theflash213]

I think combining those sections would be great. Right now the last post in item lending is from yesterday and the other services section is being crowded by the account lendig services

 

[Time To Buy]

I support this idea.

One: it would give account lending a proper section
Two: more traffic would be brought to item lending. I had a FREE lending store before free trade (the most successful store in that section while I had it open) yet I still only got maybe one person every 4 days due to the low traffic that was there.

 

[Platypi]

I support this idea.

One: it would give account lending a proper section
Two: more traffic would be brought to item lending. I had a FREE lending store before free trade (the most successful store in that section while I had it open) yet I still only got maybe one person every 4 days due to the low traffic that was there.

Basically what I think. If you look at the Other Section its flooded with Account Lending services.

 

[gangsta12]

I support this idea .

 

[JCxHS]

I don't see any reason against merging this with item lending. It would bring more activity to the section.

Yes.. But realize this.

If I'm a staff or trusted member..

I go around privately on MSN asking for 20-200M+ loans.. You could easily run off with 1000M+. Just sayin. Think of it from both sides.

 

[gangsta12]

Theres supported and defensive arguments about this