• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

What's your IQ?

mines probably low as fuck, but ive never taken a iq test... if theres a legit one online, i'll take it.
 
lol all this thread is is people stroking there egos saying false IQ numbers.

164 the original poster said, that is Albert Einstein's IQ. You believe you're as smart as Einstein?


OT: I'm at 122 last I took it.
 
malakadang said:
IQ is not ones degree of 'smartness'

The guy with the worlds highest IQ works in a bar, with an IQ over 200. Does that mean he is much smarter than Einstein? No.
Click to expand...

Kim Ung-Yong (born March 8, 1962) is a Korean former child prodigy. Kim was listed in the Guinness Book of World Records under "Highest IQ"; the book estimated the boy's score at about 210.[1]

Shortly after birth, Kim began to display extraordinary intellectual ability. He began speaking at 4 months, could converse fluently by 6 months, and was able to read Japanese, Korean, German, and English by his second birthday. Furthermore, it took about a month for him to learn a foreign language. After 7 months later he learned concepts of multiplication, he could understand concepts of differential calculus. At the age of four, on November 2, 1967, he solved complicated differential and integral calculus problems on Japanese television. Even in early childhood, he began to write poetry and was an amazing painter.[2]

Kim was a guest student of physics at Hanyang University auditing courses from the age of 4 until he was 7. In 1970, at the age of 8, he was invited to the United States by NASA. He finished his university studies, eventually getting a Ph.D. in physics at Colorado State University. In 1974, during his university studies, he began his research work at NASA and continued this work until his return to Korea in 1978.[3]

Back in Korea, he decided to switch from physics to civil engineering and eventually received a doctorate in that field. He eventually published about 90 papers on hydraulics in scientific journals.[3] As of 2007[update] he also serves as adjunct faculty at Chungbuk National University.


Sorry I didn't know Kim Ung-yong worked in a Bar:mad: /end sarcasm . And regardless of whether you think IQ accurately depicts "smartness" or not it's extremely relative.
 
I have always related IQ to the ability of seeing logic and patterns. - Never looked at it as a "smartness-scale".
 
Two Factor Authentication User
Easter 2013
Doge
Community Participant
Deathawaitss said:


Kim Ung-Yong (born March 8, 1962) is a Korean former child prodigy. Kim was listed in the Guinness Book of World Records under "Highest IQ"; the book estimated the boy's score at about 210.[1]

Shortly after birth, Kim began to display extraordinary intellectual ability. He began speaking at 4 months, could converse fluently by 6 months, and was able to read Japanese, Korean, German, and English by his second birthday. Furthermore, it took about a month for him to learn a foreign language. After 7 months later he learned concepts of multiplication, he could understand concepts of differential calculus. At the age of four, on November 2, 1967, he solved complicated differential and integral calculus problems on Japanese television. Even in early childhood, he began to write poetry and was an amazing painter.[2]

Kim was a guest student of physics at Hanyang University auditing courses from the age of 4 until he was 7. In 1970, at the age of 8, he was invited to the United States by NASA. He finished his university studies, eventually getting a Ph.D. in physics at Colorado State University. In 1974, during his university studies, he began his research work at NASA and continued this work until his return to Korea in 1978.[3]

Back in Korea, he decided to switch from physics to civil engineering and eventually received a doctorate in that field. He eventually published about 90 papers on hydraulics in scientific journals.[3] As of 2007[update] he also serves as adjunct faculty at Chungbuk National University.


Sorry I didn't know Kim Ung-yong worked in a Bar:mad: /end sarcasm . And regardless of whether you think IQ accurately depicts "smartness" or not it's extremely relative.
Click to expand...

Didn't know it got updated, but was referring to this guy - http://videosift.com/video/The-Worlds-Smartest-Man-Works-in-a-Bar-Fascinating
 
Bro said:
No trolling please, just answer.

Mine's 164.
Don't care if you believe me or not.
Click to expand...

That's extremely impressive. I'm jelly.
No idea what mine is, I'm to afraid to take the test rofl.
 
I've never taken an official test. I took a Mensa card test (60 cards) and got every one right, which means they estimated my IQ to be 155+. I've taken a few online tests and consistently scored between 140 and 170. Realistically I think I am 145-155.
 
I've never actually tested for my personal IQ, I find these website tests non-legitimate.

I have however been told I have a very high EQ through work placement tests.

I think it's more valuable ;)
 
Tried afew online tests probably averaging out at 150ish but i was always good at solving puzzles and patterns :L
 
If you had access to all the nootropics unavailable to the public, plus all the other methods I described, then you could go from 100 IQ to 160+ without a doubt, and Kim Ung-Yong could reach 220-230+ easily.

Hydrogel may replace stem cells for the repair of brain injury. ~ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8233209.stm [This article is 1 1/2 years old. The trials in mice will probably finish within 1-3 years. Humans will soon be able to volunteer for or participate in clinical trials of the treatment]

This would be the solution to saving the life of someone after a serious brain injury such as a stroke, or one causing a coma coma leading to a persistent vegetative state. There is absolutely no reason why we must discontinue life support to these people.

Hydrogel is 99% water, with other [often proprietary] constituents in order to allow and provide the transport of nutrients, growth of cells, and a non-toxic medium for that growth. It's being used now as wound dressing and to manufacture contact lenses but it has the potential to repair any organ, tissue or cellular grouping in the body. It provides a growth medium by triggering the mechanisms by which cells use to reproduce and grow the same rate they do before birth. This is what allows neurons to reproduce, when there are little other circumstances they would be able to without chemical induction of cellular growth and reproduction.

Stem cells are not as effective often times because for some reason these are able to mutate into or reproduce surrounding cancerous cells. The brain has it's own neural stem cells within the subventricular zone and the hippocampus. ~ http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100401100957.htm

Does that enlighten you? I hope to bring insight to the public about these important issues.
 
dangerousd777 said:
If you had access to all the nootropics unavailable to the public, plus all the other methods I described, then you could go from 100 IQ to 160+ without a doubt, and Kim Ung-Yong could reach 220-230+ easily.

Hydrogel may replace stem cells for the repair of brain injury. ~ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8233209.stm [This article is 1 1/2 years old. The trials in mice will probably finish within 1-3 years. Humans will soon be able to volunteer for or participate in clinical trials of the treatment]

This would be the solution to saving the life of someone after a serious brain injury such as a stroke, or one causing a coma coma leading to a persistent vegetative state. There is absolutely no reason why we must discontinue life support to these people.

Hydrogel is 99% water, with other [often proprietary] constituents in order to allow and provide the transport of nutrients, growth of cells, and a non-toxic medium for that growth. It's being used now as wound dressing and to manufacture contact lenses but it has the potential to repair any organ, tissue or cellular grouping in the body. It provides a growth medium by triggering the mechanisms by which cells use to reproduce and grow the same rate they do before birth. This is what allows neurons to reproduce, when there are little other circumstances they would be able to without chemical induction of cellular growth and reproduction.

Stem cells are not as effective often times because for some reason these are able to mutate into or reproduce surrounding cancerous cells. The brain has it's own neural stem cells within the subventricular zone and the hippocampus. ~ http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100401100957.htm

Does that enlighten you? I hope to bring insight to the public about these important issues.
Click to expand...

Those wouldn't affect IQ, they would increase acquirable intelligence. IQ tests are not supposed to test education, only ability.
 
rsaccounttrader said:
Those wouldn't affect IQ, they would increase acquirable intelligence. IQ tests are not supposed to test education, only ability.
Click to expand...

The changes *are* very measurable on a standardized IQ test, and the difference is measurable through several other means; therefore, they're basically improving your potential ability, from what you're stating. Although, IQ is a variable, not a constant, so how will you know if it's a true measure of someone's ability? If you drink a cup of coffee, your peak of intelligence as risen, whereas if you become inebriated by alcohol, the opposite becomes true. Although temporary, you would see that. This applies to other nootropics/'anti-nootropics' [sedative-hypnotics; depressants.] We should see intelligence as a floor, and as a ceiling -- a range, rather than an end-all, be-all of a person's true aptitude.

Once again, motivation exceeds ability in importance. Those who are not able will become so with enough motivation to complete a task; under reason, of course.
 
dangerousd777 said:
The changes *are* very measurable on a standardized IQ test, and the difference is measurable through several other means; therefore, they're basically improving your potential ability, from what you're stating. Although, IQ is a variable, not a constant, so how will you know if it's a true measure of someone's ability? If you drink a cup of coffee, your peak of intelligence as risen, whereas if you become inebriated by alcohol, the opposite becomes true. Although temporary, you would see that. This applies to other nootropics/'anti-nootropics' [sedative-hypnotics; depressants.] We should see intelligence as a floor, and as a ceiling -- a range, rather than an end-all, be-all of a person's true aptitude.

Once again, motivation exceeds ability in importance. Those who are not able will become so with enough motivation to complete a task; under reason, of course.
Click to expand...

What do the drugs actually do?
 
If 130+ is top 2% and considered genius then;

A) Sythe users who viewed this thread tend to be very gifted (statistically unlikely)
B) Sythe users who viewed this thread are lying
C) The tests Sythe users are taking are bull shit

And I’m inclined to think C. Ten minute online tests are rubbish, they wildly overestimate scores – if you actually had an IQ of 164 you would of realised this for yourself.

Do you really think IQ scores in that range can be determined by asking questions like:

Library is to book as book is to
A. Page
B. Copy
C. Binding
D. Cover

(yes it's Page, well done!)

--
I got 144 on last online test. I think my actual IQ would be 110 max.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
Post
What's Your IQ?
Replies
12
Views
279
At The Gates
A
runescapez
Post
IQ: How smart are we guys?!
Replies
2
Views
228
BEN007
BEN007
Surf
Post
  • Poll Poll
What is your IQ?
2 3 4
Replies
68
Views
2,337
Who Needs 2h
Who Needs 2h
malakadang
Star
Take this IQ test - Post your results!
2
Replies
23
Views
783
0wn_dem_rune_rocks
0
pha que1
Post
What's Your IQ?
2 3
Replies
45
Views
1,269
Anti-Virus
Anti-Virus
Back
Top