Thanks for your response superfluous!
First of all, we already have a fully working product to the full requests of the customer, to send the customer, as shown in the proof in earlier reply.
The part which is extremely important is that before the agreement was made, the buyer was telling us,"you can have it like axe double maul too? or like double maul to dh axe? which is in the very starting stages of our conversation,we responded: that we do it in the most efficient order,stating nowhere he expects a AGS spec. He wanted a weapon combo which did whack -> special attack - > whack. Nowhere did he state he wanted to be doing a AGS spec before.
My assistant cant be blamed, for misunderstanding AGS to gmaul to axe, for AGS spec to gmaul, which was asked for at far later stages after the agreement was made.
This was the only question about the combo/ what it uses when it uses etc.
Then the MM did a nice suggestion, to kinda add on to our agreement:
Screenshot - b04fd48e44e44666c3209a90585221bd - Gyazo
May it be not properly expressed what the client wanted, or not, the dev woke up and inserted the custom functionality, where the customer asked for a whack-specialattack-whack combo, we now had to deliver a dh setup plugin.
The point is, all the customer asked before the buy:
-You can have it axe double maul too? or like double maul to dh axe
We answered with: Its in the most efficient order, because all we chase is the kill.
Now that suggests a "static" order, which customer already was fine with, where we delivered a plugin, that was able to do whack-specialattack-whack
double spec to whack
single spec to single spec
So more then 1 option. We wanna express the fact that calling our topnotch quality products, made by exclusively us, in the same sentence as " trying to pass it off as their own work" wouldnt be deserved especially showing proof of already offering updated + extra functions as sign of a friendly gesture already..