Thats what homophobic people do. And you're justifying it by saying some LGBT folks are violent and hateful toward hetero folks
Thats what homophobic people do. And you're justifying it by saying some LGBT folks are violent and hateful toward hetero folks
You can change your sexual preference, you can't change your ethnicity.
This just shows you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
This just shows you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
http://www.yoursexualorientation.in...tation.info/Sexual_Orientation_Myths.php#2702
The ignorance is unreal in here. I will start replying to old comments tomorrow when I'm not on my phone.
Not saying there isn't, but can anyone actually show that a gay gene actually exists, from a credible source, with proof?
I still can't understand how someone can be afraid of someone else who is gay. Maybe I'm the one in the wrong for not accepting this supposed fear, but most of the homophobes I've personally spoken to seem more angry and disgusted than afraid. You probably talk to more gay people than you think, but if you're a homophobe, you wouldn't know that unless they're open about it.
Then there's the flamboyant guys that may seem gay but aren't, being a common misconception. Are homophobes afraid of them too even though they aren't gay, but seem gay? Then that would mean they aren't afraid of gay people, it would make them afraid of gay people AND people who appear to be gay, which is entirely silly if you ask me.
Opinions are alright, but it doesn't make you any less of a bigot if you're saying something racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.
People who hold negative views on others without a decent reason bother me, so I personally think being homophobic is a load of crap. Someone else being gay doesn't directly affect you, let alone offend you. So I definitely see a problem with homophobia. People are so cruel for absolutely no reason. But there will always be a battle over some group of people.
I don't think you know what you're debating anymore. Your poorly thought out responses have bounced everywhere imaginable. Are you trying to discuss whether homophobia is a bad thing, or show us your skills with using a dictionary?
I don't know why you keep pulling society into the equation. Reason does not inherently drive people in a society -- it drives people, and these people participate in society. Society is not related to reason in a directly causal way.
I also think you are fundamentally misunderstanding what you are even saying. You are speaking without boundary or restraint and your thoughts are riddled with contradiction. There are two ways of approaching this "issue". Either, morality or any form of "human construct" (that is, the category whose science depends on the substance of our reasoning not on observable data) is impossible (because it doesn't rest on anything concrete) and then we are quite lost in navigating the world as human beings; or, there is a truth in the reasoning power available to us (i.e. I can assuredly say that it is truly wrong to kill another person) and then the world becomes comprehensible and possible to be traversed through reason. If you hold the first view, there is little anyone can say about anything.
Your whole "beliefs are not controlled and an attempt to change someone else's in favour of my own is a mere unjustified imposition (a construct of society)" idea is utterly incongruous. I have debunked it earlier in this thread, but if I were to reformat my attack in a perhaps more compelling manner I would say: It is impossible to hold a contradictory belief. One cannot believe in God and simultaneously deny God. Thus, beliefs are subject to the law of contradiction. The law of contradiction is a system of logic and logic is apprehended through reason. Thus, beliefs are apprehended through reason. Regardless the extent of this apprehension, the fact that it exists at all -- again -- tears down your point.
Appropriately then, when I claim that a person's belief concerning homophobia is unfounded I am appealing to the laws of logic. In the same way that one cannot hold a contradictory opinion, I assert that the homophobic opinion is at odds with the premises of reason by failing to sufficiently understand human nature. Thus, this belief is wrong.
The fact that you associate this kind of logical process with the workings of society testifies only to the intellectual maturity of the 21st century, where we are privy to an unprecedented level of logic entrenched in our societal customs -- but this CANNOT be confused for the source.
This just shows you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
Fear can derive from anger or hatred. It's not necessarily the fear of someone, rather the label that is associated with that person. Wouldn't you say we're all bigoted? We all find ideas that we don't find acceptable or tolerant. Murderers/Whistle blowers/Thieves/Liars don't directly affect me, but we still find them offensive. Why is that? Oh, because we're bigots and follow a moral code that says we should. You reiterate the word I as if your opinion holds any more weight than the ones opposing you.
Stop posting on this thread.
Because society is the epitome of suppression. If your views are not one that is identical to that of the majority, you're ridiculed for it. Anyone you're associated with also takes heat for supporting you, causing unnecessary collateral damage. I was thorough in my delivery, and it hasn't changed. This whole debate revolves around if homophobia is a "bad thing", I mean it's in the title for heavens sake. Is the aversion of homosexuality inferior? The only way to determine that is to look at the social construct of a society, and it's moral code. There is no universal code that oppresses views of the minority. I've already explained why sexuality and ethnicity are not, and should not be looked at congruently in terms of importance. Your sexuality doesn't define you, your ethnicity does. Like I said before, your sexual orientation can change, your ethnicity cannot. When identifying a person, is their sexual orientation ever mentioned?
http://www.yoursexualorientation.info/Sexual_Orientation_Myths.php
Myth #6: A person’s sexual orientation is unchanging throughout their lifetime.
You would be ignorant to ignore human curiosity. It's all about arousal and stimulating pleasure. Humans being one of the few mammals that have sex just for the pleasure suggests that gender should not matter as long as you're being pleasured.
Myth #6: A person’s sexual orientation is unchanging throughout their lifetime.
You would be ignorant to ignore human curiosity. It's all about arousal and stimulating pleasure. Humans being one of the few mammals that have sex just for the pleasure suggests that gender should not matter as long as you're being pleasured.
Murderers, thieves, liars, etc. have a choice whereas gay people don't. And it is not my intention for it to seem like I'm trying to make my opinion weigh more.Fear can derive from anger or hatred. It's not necessarily the fear of someone, rather the label that is associated with that person. Wouldn't you say we're all bigoted? We all find ideas that we don't find acceptable or tolerant. Murderers/Whistle blowers/Thieves/Liars don't directly affect me, but we still find them offensive. Why is that? Oh, because we're bigots and follow a moral code that says we should. You reiterate the word I as if your opinion holds any more weight than the ones opposing you.
Because discriminators should be silenced.
If you do not support it, then you don't have an accepted opinion on it. If you don't care, then you don't have an opinion.
It's very weird that in 2014 we are still unable to accept people for who they are. And the fact that people have to make a movement to be accepted is bad enough in it'self.
What is homophobia? It's the fear, aversion, or distaste of homosexuality/homosexuals.
Now there isn't anything necessarily wrong with phobias, unless it's against the ideals of progressives, or radical left wingers.
In many instances, if you're a celebrity, or a well known person, the loathing of homosexuality can very well destroy your reputation/career. Everything you've done, accomplished, and sought for is disregarded and overlapped with the societal expectations set for everyone.
What exactly makes this phobia worse than any other in terms of immoral backlash?
Instead of doctrine being shoved down throats, it's societal expectations!

