OMM System

[FireZ]

Grammar nazi, Fix Beibg to Being ;p

On mobile

 

[UndoingJaguar31]

On mobile

Haha, I will forgive you this time then.

 

Even through I got denied twice I like current system. However OMMs since they already passed the whole application should have a word in OMM application polls, if globals+ can view private middlemen forum, then we could just poll applications here, however I'll never support community voting for OMMs

 

[Dave]

@Suf if you think Unb4nn3d is laying the idea out better than myself or Roary, then stick to seeing it from his POV because we're all saying the same things in different ways.

The way you've outlined it on the second to last post of the page prior to this one is a pretty accurate description of how we plan for it to work.

 

[Burnley]

the vouches do the talking, the more popular members of staff will get a lot of brown nose's and suck ups..

 

[Boosting Hell]

the vouches do the talking, the more popular members of staff will get a lot of brown nose's and suck ups..

This^

I've not really been here long to have a valid say in this argument, but looking at it logically, the OMM requirements should be hard and should stay as they are, I wouldn't want to know i'm trusting an OMM with let's say 10,000$ when they only have 100 vouches, but because they're popular members of staff, they've managed to become an OMM.

 

This^

I've not really been here long to have a valid say in this argument, but looking at it logically, the OMM requirements should be hard and should stay as they are, I wouldn't want to know i'm trusting an OMM with let's say 10,000$ when they only have 100 vouches, but because they're popular members of staff, they've managed to become an OMM.

The OMM application/requirements aren't changing. Completing an OMM app means you've been trusted with a considerable amount of cash.

 

[Boosting Hell]

The OMM application/requirements aren't changing. Completing an OMM app means you've been trusted with a considerable amount of cash.

I know, I was just saying my opinion on it

 

[SuF]

@Suf if you think Unb4nn3d is laying the idea out better than myself or Roary, then stick to seeing it from his POV because we're all saying the same things in different ways.

The way you've outlined it on the second to last post of the page prior to this one is a pretty accurate description of how we plan for it to work.

As long as they are doing a mostly objective job then its whatever.

 

[Shin]

So let me summarize your posts since the information is so scattered.

1) Pending OMM applications get discussed in the OMM forums by the OMMs.
2) Discussions are structured such that the OMMs look at the applications and the trades within.
3) Would be similar to what Sin666 used to do looking over the trades, making sure that they are correct.
4) Would tell staff any issues they find in the application and the trades within them.
4a) Could be that the application is wrong
4b) Could be that the applicant is not good at x, y, or z
4c) Could be that the applicant is particularly skilled at a, b, or c
4d) Etc, but related to the application itself.

Is that summary sufficient or is there more to it?

For the most part, this is accurate.

Not to mention, the voice/opinions of the community should be posted on the application itself as feedback, which is part of the process (outlined by Dave in a previous post).

I'm sure there are a couple other points that have not been factored in, but this is the most accurate representation of what the current system will try to accomplish at this point.

 

[SuF]

For the most part, this is accurate.

Not to mention, the voice/opinions of the community should be posted on the application itself as feedback, which is part of the process (outlined by Dave in a previous post).

I'm sure there are a couple other points that have not been factored in, but this is the most accurate representation of what the current system will try to accomplish at this point.

Cool beans. That's all that needed to be said.

 

[Dave]

Cool beans. That's all that needed to be said.

Awesome, is there any other questions/concerns about anything else? Not just from you but anyone else can pitch in.

Unb4nn3d thank you for laying things out in a more understandable manner than I could, I owe you one. :love:

 

[SuF]

Awesome, is there any other questions/concerns about anything else? Not just from you but anyone else can pitch in.

Unb4nn3d thank you for laying things out in a more understandable manner than I could, I owe you one. :love:

I'm good.

 

[Dave]

Alright, gonna leave this open for a little big longer just incase anyone else has other questions/concerns.

 

[Andreas]

What about a community vote plus staff vote and then the two combined are used to give a rational outcome.

 

[Dave]

This was already solved, I should have closed this ages ago. A community vote won't happen. Sorry Andreas