• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

Would runescape be better fully P2P?

Yea totally instead of giving shit updates for f2p they would spend more time thinking of shit updates for p2p
 
No because not many people are going to just buy a 6$ membership without trying out the game first. F2p is there so people can get a taste of the game and get them to pay for membership.
 
shox_bomber said:
No because not many people are going to just buy a 6$ membership without trying out the game first. F2p is there so people can get a taste of the game and get them to pay for membership.
Click to expand...

I agree with this, f2p is like a large tutorial for new players, also I don't think runescape would be as popular as it is today with out the large f2p options.
 
aus aaz said:
I agree with this, f2p is like a large tutorial for new players, also I don't think runescape would be as popular as it is today with out the large f2p options.
Click to expand...

That's true but they spend so much money hosting F2P Servers anyway. They could decrease the amount of servers they have forcing the free players to become members to have more space :P
 
Noss. said:
That's true but they spend so much money hosting F2P Servers anyway. They could decrease the amount of servers they have forcing the free players to become members to have more space :P
Click to expand...

The free servers are already overrun with bots, i cant even train my str pure legit without competing with 5+ bots. they need more f2p servers imo.
 
shox_bomber said:
No because not many people are going to just buy a 6$ membership without trying out the game first. F2p is there so people can get a taste of the game and get them to pay for membership.
Click to expand...

Read what he asked. It would be better fully p2p not so manny botters or scammed because who the fuck is gunna pay 6 dollars to scam and get banned next day...(i know you wont get banned just saying)
 
nah, I don't think so

As everyone else said, they're gonna lose a lot of popularity if they go P2P only.
Also, it's good to be able to continue and play/bot without having to pay for membership :P
 
<3 n4n0
Two Factor Authentication User
no, i agree with most of the people that say no too. One because the people starting to play rs need to get a feel of what its like, then they can choose to get members, any game with this kind of option is more likly to get more people playing. if you get them to f2p most of them are going to want membership after finding out what is in store for them
 
Rune f2p is necessary because people must experience some aprt of the game first

If i dont kno how to play a game am i just gonna pay $6 to play it??
 
teh99prayerkid said:
no, i agree with most of the people that say no too. One because the people starting to play rs need to get a feel of what its like, then they can choose to get members, any game with this kind of option is more likly to get more people playing. if you get them to f2p most of them are going to want membership after finding out what is in store for them
Click to expand...
Well i guess this would be a good reason to have F2P.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top