World Wilderness [y/n]

[theif]

Do you want world wilderness back, whether it be in every world of selected worlds?

Comment your answer and reason.

 

[Lilly]

No, people shouldn't be forced to pk on specified worlds. Some worlds have "underground" pking where people just take pking to that world and very few know about it, mainly for high riskers who want good loots, removing that ability would be stupid.

 

[SocalOmega]

i would like that back. Not with the combat update however.

 

[Sycophant]

I would like the wildy to stay, but also 1 or 2 worlds to pk on as I used to like pking in places I would usually be training. Like being able to just find people training and prey on them, that may just be me though.

 

[bob1337]

I liked the pvp worlds setup, not sure why they removed it.

 

[0belisk]

Yes, Respective worlds.

The concept of PVP worlds where pking is possible everywhere except banks etc was a very cool idea and brings more fun to the game. However if this was implemented in all worlds that would ruin the game.

They should just have 1-3 worlds that are themed to PK servers.

 

[Yenthe666]

I actually liked it
But than only in a few worlds. Keeps things interesting for everybody!

 

[Blue Angel_]

Voted no accidently, but it would be cool to have 1 or 2 pvp worlds

 

[ifh]

I loved pvp worlds.

Even if you're totally hate pvp, you can simply avoid the worlds. There are no downsides to it. I have no idea why they removed them :/

 

[Punkerpunk13]

I liked the pvp worlds setup, not sure why they removed it.

I completely agree. I thought PvP Worlds concept was brilliant.

 

[Killercrow]

Yeah, i don't understand why they removed them in the first place.

 

[Jeers]

PVP worlds were awesome, it was much more fun!

 

[sonic_fanrs]

Those PVP Worlds were a BLAST. The only bad thing was the drops were fucked up at the time.

Yes, respective worlds.

 

[McKinnonj]

No. It takes out the aspect of original RS. I can see how many newfags thought in their head that that was the definition of pking. It makes me laugh.

 

[Teixeira]

If you mean PvP worlds then no, there are more than enough PvP facilities at your disposal including the crucible theatre, wilderness and duel arena.

 

[Qeltern4]

Keep it as it is. Has been messed around many times anyway. I feel that pvp worlds are too large for effective pvp anyway

 

[BGlave]

No it divided too many pkers.

 

[Jedi Knight]

I thought it was great personally, yes

 

No. It takes out the aspect of original RS. I can see how many newfags thought in their head that that was the definition of pking. It makes me laugh.

I disagree, original RS is totally gone. Why not move forward and try out new things like PvP worlds? It'd be awesome if Jagex implemented the PvP world system in a few worlds F2P & P2P.

 

[woodcut ox]

No, they where dumb and the drops where screwed up. The whole PvP worlds update was jagex responding to the loss of players when they removed free trade and Pking imo.