When someone is BANNED

[XaLfA OwNz]

All of their threads and posts should just be permanently deleted or softly deleted. No need to keep them for other users to see.

 

[Trip.Fagex]

No support...that would just be stupid and pointless. Plus it would take forever to do...

 

[ll champion]

Lol, it's crazy to look at a old thread and there is over %70 of the people who posted banned.
Sounds like heaps of work, it's not affecting anybody really...

 

[jCash]

No, some of the oldest posts are from banned members.

 

[Fa1lBoat]

Yea, Too much work. And what is the point?

 

[Skele]

All of their threads and posts should just be permanently deleted or softly deleted. No need to keep them for other users to see.

Their posts are useful whether or not they're banned.

 

[Rhodesy]

People would be accused of valse vouching and there would be no evidence. No support.

 

[Granitmaul0]

Do not want. Posts from banned people can still be useful, and it would be very hard to make sense of a thread where people had posted before getting banned.

 

[FireZ]

If we did that where we get the majority of our laughs from.

Love threads where 70%+ are banned they are usually great.

 

Then lose some Mods closed sticky or someone elses important post and not to mention lose stats. Nah

 

[I3laze]

to almost EVERYONE who has posted on this thread, +1.

 

No. A high majority of the posts can be useful and we don't want all that useful information gone.

 

[Damon Salvatore]

No. All those members have at least a few useful posts. Our members could learn/use the information given in those posts.

 

[SmithyRs]

If they got all deleted, everyone who has earned there post count, imagine, gohanforever - 7.6k posts, could go down to 4k.
Plus, the posts can still be useful.
No support.

 

This has been a suggestion before, and did not pass. For a website, the more members/posts the better. If we delete thousands and thousands of posts, Sythe.org would have weird confusing threads, and advertisers would pay less to advertise.