JIGL0JAY
Forum Addict
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2010
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 287
1) It was not a gang violence, once again you're pulling shit out your fucking ass without proof. Stop acting like you know everything.
2) NEVER compare yourself to Sythe. He's wayyyy more educated than most people on this site and when some dumb-fuck like you posts bullshit that makes no sense, that's when he doesn't tolerate shit. You on the other hand post bullshit and don't read into anything and when you're proven wrong, you refuse to read the evidence.
3) You do act like you know everything. Don't even deny it. Don't bother post here if you're going to be a fucking dick about it. Why? I can be a much greater dick on this site than ANY. You're welcome to ask anyone for verification, if you please.
1) So it wasn't gang violence. Explain it then. Someone assassinated Easy-E, Tupac, Biggie, and every single "famous" celebrity, right?
Even if they died of natural causes, they were assassinated for their fame, right? This sounds like that whole thing with Kirk Cobain and Jimi Hendrix and the power of 27. A bunch of really famous artists died at age 27. There's a conspiracy about that too.
2) I only said Sythe was arrogant and didn't tolerate bullshit. I never said that I was on par with his arguments. But you know what, I can go ahead and say that just because Sythe is a good debator, doesn't mean that nobody else can be. This is the discussion forum, yeah, but you're discussing something that I don't find to be true. The question is "What is the Illuminati?" I say it's smoke and mirrors. You say it exists. You can say you don't have to prove it to me all you want, but if you're not proving it exists to anyone else, then IT DOESN'T EXIST AND YOU NEED TO GET OFF THE THREAD.
Again, you say I don't read the evidence. But did you take the time to read my list? It was sarcasm, but look at any "Illuminati in the media" video, and compare it to my list. I hit most of the nails on the head, right? A lot of things in videos are compared to "satanic" or "symbolic" things, right? Could it just be that a music video is all about imagery, and not just someone sitting there making singing into a camera?
3) If you refuse to put up a challenge on whether it exists, and resort to only attacking my character or what I do/don't know, then you're only making yourself look like a fool. I'm being straightforward and honest. Your proof is things that aren't actual proof. You say they are too big for us, but the fact that they would make it so obvious just makes it seem like you're grasping straws. You don't challenge any of my points. You and Herman REFUSE to answer any of my questions.
The only question Herman has answered is why he doesn't do anything, and he says he doesn't do anything because they're too big. You know what that says about him, and the rest of his argument? That he's trying to scare people. When people start thinking about a boogeyman and an appeal to fear, it's just like "terrorists" right after 9/11. Muslims and middle eastern people were persecuted because a boogeyman was planted. All muslims and sikhs and everything became terrorists. This is the exact same type of boogeyman placed by Illuminati speculators. If a natural disaster happens, or someone dies, it becomes their job to tell people that someone bigger than life is calling the shots.
The only difference is, we can prove that the middle eastern people aren't terrorists. We can't even prove the Illuminati exists, so how can we prove that they're actually doing anything. It's grasping straws.




