• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

wBot's password getter hooks.

But it does the same thing with mouse too, mousePressed, mouseMoved, etc.
What makes you think that this actually logs the stuff that YOU type, instead of being just botting functions?

And if you're decompliling it, please continue, it's great to see someone else really looking into it to make sure if its safe or not.
 
Wow! Congrats man! Why didn't anyone else think of decompiling and deobbing the client to check for the so called "malicious code" you are a genius and we should worship you at your feet.


You think you are the first person to do this? Tons of people have checked the client and no one has found anything. This isn't proof. It shows nothing. Have you even used the bot? You do in fact have to log into it using your wbot username and password. When will these idiots stop posting?
 
Congratulations, you've wasted "Insert Time You Took".
 
PHP Shit Show 2k26
Those hooks (username and pass) I'd imagine are used for the Auto-Login when they add it, the second lot there are hooked as they are injected to so that the bot uses it custom methods for clicking and typing etc.
 
The hell are you talking about?

This isn't proof of password stealing, this is proof that you don't understand what you're seeing. Trust me when I tell you that, based on this post, more knowledgeable people have spent more time looking at the client/hooks/network traffic than you and found nothing.
 
ZeroGravity said:
Wow! Congrats man! Why didn't anyone else think of decompiling and deobbing the client to check for the so called "malicious code" you are a genius and we should worship you at your feet.


You think you are the first person to do this? Tons of people have checked the client and no one has found anything. This isn't proof. It shows nothing. Have you even used the bot? You do in fact have to log into it using your wbot username and password. When will these idiots stop posting?
Click to expand...

Congratulations, Idiot. That's a Client Hook. The loging in to wBOT User/Password is not a Hook, it's not connected to the client via ByteCode manipulation injection nor does the JFrame need to be instantiated to have a function like this. Want a cookie?
 
The Xoy said:
/Lock /Delete

Quote from Webjoch himself
Click to expand...

Rofl, What? I'm sorry but that's incorrect, the Java Robot() class handles this. If they are doing it that way then the client is more inneficient that I originally had thought.
 
iJava said:
Those hooks (username and pass) I'd imagine are used for the Auto-Login when they add it, the second lot there are hooked as they are injected to so that the bot uses it custom methods for clicking and typing etc.
Click to expand...

Perhaps, I was just pointing out the hook. There's no reason for it to log the keys pressed during it though, as they just need to log the Widget ID, confirm it's active, then use the Robot() class to type
 
PHP Shit Show 2k26
CTucker1327 said:
Rofl, What? I'm sorry but that's incorrect, the Java Robot() class handles this. If they are doing it that way then the client is more inneficient that I originally had thought.
Click to expand...

OMG you're making yourself look like even more of an idiot now. Go look for the Robot class in any bot and tell me what you find. You need to use the keyTyped etc hooks to create a virtual mouse/keyboard, according to you every bot is malicious but keep up the bad work.
 
iJava said:
OMG you're making yourself look like even more of an idiot now. Go look for the Robot class in any bot and tell me what you find. You need to use the keyTyped etc hooks to create a virtual mouse/keyboard, according to you every bot is malicious but keep up the bad work.
Click to expand...

My bot works just fine using the Robot() class.
 
iJava said:
How's that working out for you with multiple tabs and it controlling your mouse.
Click to expand...

Currently not using the tabs, although I understand where you're coming from with the Virtual Mouse and the Robot() class, as the Robot() class actually physically moves the mouse on the screen. Using a Virtual Mouse/Keyboard is alright, but please inform me on why you need to HOOK the client for that, when you could create an instance inside the program without hooking it, then return the position of the Object IDs on the screen, then click on it via reflection placement.
 
CTucker1327 said:
Currently not using the tabs, although I understand where you're coming from with the Virtual Mouse and the Robot() class, as the Robot() class actually physically moves the mouse on the screen. Using a Virtual Mouse/Keyboard is alright, but please inform me on why you need to HOOK the client for that, when you could create an instance inside the program without hooking it, then return the position of the Object IDs on the screen, then click on it via reflection placement.
Click to expand...

I am 2007 fag. Haven't logged into/posted here since 2010.

But I am just going to tell you your wrong. My bot that I have been working on hooks the mouse/keyboard class, which generated the mouse movements/typing...

And wtf with that post. This just shows me you don't know what your talking about.
 
zasz said:
I am 2007 fag. Haven't logged into/posted here since 2010.

But I am just going to tell you your wrong. My bot that I have been working on hooks the mouse/keyboard class, which generated the mouse movements/typing...

But I guess that means I hook it to steal your account info.
Click to expand...

Congratulations, who's saying it can't be done that way? It leaves the opurtunity for the stealing of information to be easy, that's all I'm saying. I personally have another method. They probably both work. There's hundereds of way's to have the same out-come in programming.
 
PHP Shit Show 2k26
CTucker1327 said:
Congratulations, who's saying it can't be done that way? It leaves the opurtunity for the stealing of information to be easy, that's all I'm saying. I personally have another method. They probably both work. There's hundereds of way's to have the same out-come in programming.
Click to expand...

If they wanted to steal your details then they would not do it this way at all, go look at the dumped jar and specifically at the mouse methods which are injected.
 
CTucker1327 said:
Congratulations, who's saying it can't be done that way? It leaves the opurtunity for the stealing of information to be easy, that's all I'm saying. I personally have another method. They probably both work. There's hundereds of way's to have the same out-come in programming.
Click to expand...

Don't backtrack. If you're going to spew bullshit stand behind it. You specifically called this 'wbot's password getter hooks'. You did NOT simply say 'this could be used to obtain a users username and password', you stated that it was specifically used for malicious purposes.

If you want to save any face admit that you were proven wrong and move on with your life.

edit: Using your brain doesn't make you a wBot fanboy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top