Viou / un just dude

[Apith]

There's only 2 reasons I think R2Pleasent should be banned, and they're both pretty old. First reason is making my worker void his contract by working for him, and the second is the stupid 50B trade he did all wrong, purposely or not, and cost the guy 20 grand in loss.

The case I brought against him was moved to the staff lounge, pretty much a private court, and dismissed, so whatever.

When did that 50b occur? Link? Dont forget the snappy thing, where r2p sold an account and I dont believe he was held responsible when it was recovered by his worker. Dont quote me on that as I could be wrong, I just remember talking to snappy and that led him to quit sythe based on the outcome.

 

indeed, as i never see him in SF ne more.

and the soab needs to read the pm i sent him like a week ago

that sure is a nice new shiny advert/

 

[Delta Squad]

that sure is a nice new shiny advert/

well atleast he removed the north american company thing, being that 90% of the people in his company don't even live in NA rofl.

 

[Emperor Nero]

All this spam forum pressure guys, don't do it!

 

[BGlave]

you know its not real chicken right? it ground up bones.

Well shiet, if it tastes good ima still eat it

 

[Delta Squad]

Well shiet, if it tastes good ima still eat it

just sayin man its gnna make your pooper shoot un happy.

 

looks like someone called in the big dawg to back him up.

this is why i have no respect for dis site.

I just came here to see what all the fuss was about.

To be perfectly honest, I'm not particularly interested in looking at these cases: Just un dude, Viou, R2P. Pretty happy to just leave it all be and let the rest of staff deal with it as I normally do. I'm here because people are complaining and I have an obligation to listen.

But it seems I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't. I come to listen to the complaints and get accused of being here on behalf of R2P. I mean to illustrate how ridiculous this is: I've only ever spoken to the guy a handful of times and always about advertising.

Frankly you guys can suck it up if you don't want my help.

 

[BGlave]

just sayin man its gnna make your pooper shoot un happy.

its always un happy

 

[Emperor Nero]

I just came here to see what all the fuss was about.

To be perfectly honest, I'm not particularly interested in looking at these cases: Just un dude, Viou, R2P. Pretty happy to just leave it all be and let the rest of staff deal with it as I normally do. I'm here because people are complaining and I have an obligation to listen.

But it seems I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't. I come to listen to the complaints and get accused of being here on behalf of R2P. I mean to illustrate how ridiculous this is: I've only ever spoken to the guy a handful of times and always about advertising.

Frankly you guys can suck it up if you don't want my help.

I understand where you're coming from, it just seems like you're on his side because all of the things that have happened recently with him have been pretty shady. There is still a lot of animosity at the fact that Viou was used more as a sacrificial lamb and show of force for the staff and the same with Un dude. Though I agree with Just Un Dude's ban. I don't know enough about Viou's to decide either way. As I said before I would have to read the guide to decide.

 

I understand where you're coming from, it just seems like you're on his side because all of the things that have happened recently with him have been pretty shady. There is still a lot of animosity at the fact that Viou was used more as a sacrificial lamb and show of force for the staff and the same with Un dude. Though I agree with Just Un Dude's ban. I don't know enough about Viou's to decide either way. As I said before I would have to read the guide to decide.

I read Viou's guide. Did any of you read it?

It was a how-to-scam in my opinion.

If someone wants to find a copy we can go over it again.

This is what I think of you guys right now:

 

[Apith]

This is what I think of you guys right now:

rofl.

other than there are 3 girls too many, it is accurate.

 

[Delta Squad]

I just came here to see what all the fuss was about.

To be perfectly honest, I'm not particularly interested in looking at these cases: Just un dude, Viou, R2P. Pretty happy to just leave it all be and let the rest of staff deal with it as I normally do. I'm here because people are complaining and I have an obligation to listen.

But it seems I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't. I come to listen to the complaints and get accused of being here on behalf of R2P. I mean to illustrate how ridiculous this is: I've only ever spoken to the guy a handful of times and always about advertising.

Frankly you guys can suck it up if you don't want my help.

you need to suck it up, and go confirm or deny my idea i pm'd you about last week.

 

you need to suck it up, and go confirm or deny my idea i pm'd you about last week.

Go on then tough guy, give us the link.

 

[Plznate]

I read Viou's guide. Did any of you read it?

It was a how-to-scam in my opinion.

If someone wants to find a copy we can go over it again.

This is what I think of you guys right now:

Hat was viciously attacked by those babies. He had no choice but to defend himself.

 

[Azie]

I read Viou's guide. Did any of you read it?

It was a how-to-scam in my opinion.

If someone wants to find a copy we can go over it again.

This is what I think of you guys right now:

LOL pic........

 

[I use range]

r2p sold an account and I dont believe he was held responsible when it was recovered by his worker. Dont quote me on that as I could be wrong, I just remember talking to snappy and that led him to quit sythe based on the outcome.

this did happen, i cant seem to find it though....he claimed it has "been years" and was not held responsible for it

which is bullshit IMO

 

this did happen, i cant seem to find it though....he claimed it has "been years" and was not held responsible for it

which is bullshit IMO

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

There is a pretty important distinction between the employee doing something in accordance with their employers wishes and an employee doing something on their own without their employer's permission or against his/her wishes.

 

[I use range]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

There is a pretty important distinction between the employee doing something in accordance with their employers wishes and an employee doing something on their own without their employer's permission or against his/her wishes.

not too sure what your trying to say but i assume you linked that for this part -
"whereas an employee acting in his or her own right rather than on the employer's business is undertaking a "frolic" and will not subject the employer to liability."

so your saying if "r2anne" was to sell an account under r2pleasents wishes, then later recovers the account herself noone is held responsible?

or did i miss something

 

or did i miss something

Yes you clearly did. Perhaps you should read the article.

 

[Delta Squad]

Go on then tough guy, give us the link.

it was a pm silly. go read it.