Unfair Special treatment of Members from Staff why?

How come a report's title was changed by staff when a member was reported?

The below report was originally titled the user's name, nothing else
Report

Now it's just titled 'Report'

Below, you can see it's the only report in the entire list where the name has been changed.

Spoiler

This clearly has nothing to do with the outcome of the report, as below, are screenshots of currently closed reports that were accepted AND denied, with the accused's username still in the title. Even when the same report was made against me a year ago which was denied, my username remained in the title.

Spoiler

Also, in @BlackBlasses response, why is he saying there is 'far from enough evidence' and condescending @all4love12 , when the report mentions IP audit matches, interest matches, and similar thread layout styles? If you look above at @Wortel 's reports, he is providing the exact same evidence and the users accused are being DNT'd or banned.

Spoiler

The report looks completely legitimate and just requesting staff to take a look. Why is it shut down rudely and the title changed? This doesn't sit well with me at all and I'd appreciate a proper answer. Hundreds of trusted users accused in the past haven't had special treatment and their name edited out of just another fair identity report, why is this the case here?

 

I reviewed the report myself and edited the title after. When a report is rejected staff should change the title to clear someones name from negative SEO.

Its not always edited and most people simply don't care. Through recent events with constant harassment it is well justified.