Repentless
Apprentice
I would post this in the dispute forum, but hardly anyone looks there, and it doesn't give the community a chance to respond to a community issue- which is why I am posting this here.
I am a person who believes in justice when it comes to administration and moderation. I am fully aware that Sythe runs and pays for this site, and that he takes a great personal risk in doing so.
Thus far, I have not stepped out of line and argued with the sythe staff. In fact, I like most of the staff, and I support their decisions. However, I think the banning of Redemption was out of line.
Before you tell me that he was rebanned for returning after a ban, that's a load of shit. He should have been given a chance to argue for himself when he was banned in the first place. There is nothing in the Sythe.org official rules that he is broken that is a bannable offense.
Just because staff dislike someone, it doesn't mean they should be able to have a vote for whether or not they should be banned. It doesn't matter how annoying he was, or how pissed off he might have made you. I personally think Unknown is a dick, but you don't see me protesting about how he should be de-admined.
I would also like to make it known that if he is not unbanned, as he should be if things are fair, then I would like to retire from Sythe and have my user title changed to reflect such an event.
Thank you for taking the time to read this, and to the staff: Please think about this, and I hope you reach a fair decision.
"Stand up for what is right, even if you stand alone."
I am a person who believes in justice when it comes to administration and moderation. I am fully aware that Sythe runs and pays for this site, and that he takes a great personal risk in doing so.
Thus far, I have not stepped out of line and argued with the sythe staff. In fact, I like most of the staff, and I support their decisions. However, I think the banning of Redemption was out of line.
Before you tell me that he was rebanned for returning after a ban, that's a load of shit. He should have been given a chance to argue for himself when he was banned in the first place. There is nothing in the Sythe.org official rules that he is broken that is a bannable offense.
Just because staff dislike someone, it doesn't mean they should be able to have a vote for whether or not they should be banned. It doesn't matter how annoying he was, or how pissed off he might have made you. I personally think Unknown is a dick, but you don't see me protesting about how he should be de-admined.
I would also like to make it known that if he is not unbanned, as he should be if things are fair, then I would like to retire from Sythe and have my user title changed to reflect such an event.
Thank you for taking the time to read this, and to the staff: Please think about this, and I hope you reach a fair decision.
"Stand up for what is right, even if you stand alone."








