TWC CaptainCocoa

[JackRabbit]

CaptainCocoa

So basicly I wanted to sell him some 07 gold, got the pm, with both of our skypes (all good til here). he then tells me to go the 304 G.E "herb sign" yet he won't tell me his rsn?? I DONT UNDERSTAND maybe just trying to take advantage since I dont use sythe often but I sell to gold sites alot and if he dont send I have no proof to report i traded him TWC OR SOMTHING

 

[JackRabbit]

in conclusion i've come the realization this whole site is just sketchy and waiting for a free scam that cannot be backed by report, I rather keep selling to bogla or another big website for like a 5 cents less with the piece of mind at this point.. come on how now

 

[Bulletproof]

in conclusion i've come the realization this whole site is just sketchy and waiting for a free scam that cannot be backed by report, I rather keep selling to bogla or another big website for like a 5 cents less with the piece of mind at this point.. come on how now

youre sketchy you ban evader

 

[Curry212]

Tbh I cant see how this warrants a TWC, if he says he will confirm that it is him you are trading then it should be fine? There is no rule stating that he MUST provide his ign for you to trade, although I can see why it might make you suspicious.

Just get a confirmation over skype or sythe and everything is fine, something like :
"Trading (his ign) 100m from (your ign)?"
and he replies :
"100m (his ign) from (your ign)".

Also take a screenshot of the trade screen in-game, and there you have your proof.
Tbh I feel you're just over thinking this entire thing and jumping to conclusions. If you dont trust the specific buyer then by all means, sell it to the large gold resellers, they are by far more trustable.

In short, dont think this warrants a TWC as there is no proof of attempted scam. If you dont trust this forums then no one is forcing you to use it, sell your gold to the large gold resellers. Just my 2cents, a mod will have the final say. gl & hf

 

[JackRabbit]

Tbh I cant see how this warrants a TWC, if he says he will confirm that it is him you are trading then it should be fine? There is no rule stating that he MUST provide his ign for you to trade, although I can see why it might make you suspicious.

Just get a confirmation over skype or sythe and everything is fine, something like :
"Trading (his ign) 100m from (your ign)?"
and he replies :
"100m (his ign) from (your ign)".

Also take a screenshot of the trade screen in-game, and there you have your proof.
Tbh I feel you're just over thinking this entire thing and jumping to conclusions. If you dont trust the specific buyer then by all means, sell it to the large gold resellers, they are by far more trustable.

In short, dont think this warrants a TWC as there is no proof of attempted scam. If you dont trust this forums then no one is forcing you to use it, sell your gold to the large gold resellers. Just my 2cents, a mod will have the final say. gl & hf

thanks for your "2cents" but my mentality behind the scenario is once I trade him the gold he can easily say someone else traded him at the exact same time and it was a coincidence, you go to any gold reseller they give you world/name/location. To avoid any type of this. and litterally he DID NOT GIVE ME HIS RSN, so again thanks for your 2cents, but its not warranted.

 

[jason_rs]

thanks for your "2cents" but my mentality behind the scenario is once I trade him the gold he can easily say someone else traded him at the exact same time and it was a coincidence, you go to any gold reseller they give you world/name/location. To avoid any type of this. and litterally he DID NOT GIVE ME HIS RSN, so again thanks for your 2cents, but its not warranted.

This does smell quite fishy to me, he doesnt have to put his rsn but it help jack knowing he is trading the right guy (even if he confirms) it allows him to have images as proof.

 

[malakadang]

This doesn't warrant a TwC.

People are free to insist that a trade be conducted a specific way; you are also free to insist the trade be conducted a certain way, and/or reject the way he proposed. That of itself cannot give rise to a TwC. I agree that him not wanting to give you his RSN is highly cautious behaviour to say the least, but without more, it doesn't justify a TwC.