Yes. That would constitute leaking.
Yes, and I'm glad other voters had better judgment than me - your relentless whining is not a quality I'd have liked for a new Official Middleman. We can't have Official Middlemen who are insistent on throwing tantrums whenever they don't get their own way.
Again, I'll restate for you:
Justifications are obligatory, and if they aren't sufficient, or are erroneous or questionable, the person is challenged.
It's not all about the application - that is just a necessary part of the process that, once completed, permits the voting thread to be made.
We also judge on how well applicants conduct themselves on the site.
You're right, you're not.
Neither are Vic, Vietballer, Ryan, etc...
I do, but I also like you when you're not making an exhibition of yourself.
I wonder why you presume I voted no. Were the matter revoted on, I'd undoubtedly vote no based on this immature episode.
No.
Just did. Stop whining and grow up.