BEEF TOILET
Stephen Hawking and many other physicists agree that time travel to the past is impossible since it would always create a paradox. Not only that, but there is hardly any known methods for travelling to the past at all unless we were somehow able to grasp the nature of the common wormhole (wormholes exist all around us in extremely tiny proportions, smaller than an electron) or to grab spacetime and literally jerk it backwards.
Anyway, by travelling to the past, people say it would create an issue/problem or a paradox. For example, say you start sharpening a dull knife enough to stab someone. Then, once it's sharp, you open up a wormhole to the past where you were still sharpening, then you kill yourself. This doesn't work and makes our brains hurt because it technically can't happen. Well it can, just not with the physics people think of today.
What I'm proposing is that perhaps linear spacetime is not actually linear, but has a 2nd visual dimmension added on top of the 4th dimmensional fabric for it to branch out at specific moments where a paradox could occur. If spacetime were in fact linear, this would mean that everything, every choice you make, is not in fact out of free will but a universally preset destiny. Since the universe would have to compensate for every minor detail involved in decision making and the possibility for different paths to be taken, everything would have had to already be set in stone. This would mean that, technically, everything would have already happened and that time either goes on to infinite, or that it perhaps acts as a mathematical straight line and eventually curves back into a circle. This would suggest one big time loop, where the universe ends in a big bang just as it started (but, our universe is exponentially shaped meaning it will forever expand and will not end).
Anyway, back to the dimmensional fabric I was speaking of before. If you could have the universe calculate everyaction of every decision, you would effectively have a line of spacetime with many branches, forming the shape of a tree. This would completely eliminate time paradoxes. Say for instance time travel to the past was possible, and one day someone did it. There would have to be compensation for the paradox or else the universe would be thrown off balance and would just fuck up all over the place (I don't even know what would happen). This is why I've started to think that wormholes don't link two times in the same "branch" but link two different "branches" where the outcome of events was different. This would mean that no paradox would occur, and the knife guy from the example I mentioned earlier would effectively kill himself in another branch but continue to live in his own branch.
Now, if you were to consider the loop thing I was talking about earlier, the same would apply except that beyond spacetime there would be yet another container containing these time loops (also in a 2D fashion) where each loop would interconnect at similar moments, say the birth of a child. They would all theoretically start at the same point, but perhaps be bigger than the others, smaller, or of a different shape.
Anyway I've got no math to back me up since I haven't learned any of this shit yet, just spewing out ideas. Thoughts?
Anyway, by travelling to the past, people say it would create an issue/problem or a paradox. For example, say you start sharpening a dull knife enough to stab someone. Then, once it's sharp, you open up a wormhole to the past where you were still sharpening, then you kill yourself. This doesn't work and makes our brains hurt because it technically can't happen. Well it can, just not with the physics people think of today.
What I'm proposing is that perhaps linear spacetime is not actually linear, but has a 2nd visual dimmension added on top of the 4th dimmensional fabric for it to branch out at specific moments where a paradox could occur. If spacetime were in fact linear, this would mean that everything, every choice you make, is not in fact out of free will but a universally preset destiny. Since the universe would have to compensate for every minor detail involved in decision making and the possibility for different paths to be taken, everything would have had to already be set in stone. This would mean that, technically, everything would have already happened and that time either goes on to infinite, or that it perhaps acts as a mathematical straight line and eventually curves back into a circle. This would suggest one big time loop, where the universe ends in a big bang just as it started (but, our universe is exponentially shaped meaning it will forever expand and will not end).
Anyway, back to the dimmensional fabric I was speaking of before. If you could have the universe calculate everyaction of every decision, you would effectively have a line of spacetime with many branches, forming the shape of a tree. This would completely eliminate time paradoxes. Say for instance time travel to the past was possible, and one day someone did it. There would have to be compensation for the paradox or else the universe would be thrown off balance and would just fuck up all over the place (I don't even know what would happen). This is why I've started to think that wormholes don't link two times in the same "branch" but link two different "branches" where the outcome of events was different. This would mean that no paradox would occur, and the knife guy from the example I mentioned earlier would effectively kill himself in another branch but continue to live in his own branch.
Now, if you were to consider the loop thing I was talking about earlier, the same would apply except that beyond spacetime there would be yet another container containing these time loops (also in a 2D fashion) where each loop would interconnect at similar moments, say the birth of a child. They would all theoretically start at the same point, but perhaps be bigger than the others, smaller, or of a different shape.
Anyway I've got no math to back me up since I haven't learned any of this shit yet, just spewing out ideas. Thoughts?
