The way Moderators are selected

[Vlad]

Well, I posted this in a feedback thread complaining about how some Mods were picked, and I think this could solve it.

As a problem solver for all of this, why don't the staff vote to see if someone will be decided as mod?

The Team Leader puts their name through, and the Staff vote for it? I'm assuming the Special Moderator forum would be best for this.

This way, no one gets the blame if someone is selected and does something wrong (MatthewGor), and no one gets the blame if they think favouritism was involved (Unb4nn3d).

 

[Heeckeren]

Good idea and it would make the selection of mods much fairer .

 

[ItsNate]

Question.

Why do you care?

 

[SuF]

Question.

Why do you care?

I think because he does not want unbanned as a mod.


Really... Does it matter? It someone is a bad mod they will be demoted. If they are a good mod, everyone that hates them will get over themselves...

 

[1337it]

unbanned would be shit at mod, no offence.

 

[Aeroplane]

I support. Seems way more fair that all moderators get a say.

 

[Louis]

Unb4nn3d shouldn't have gotten mod, that's why.

 

[i noob killer i]

i belive some people are jelous for some reason maybe there not mods?

 

[Vlad]

I don't mind unb4nn3d, as I have stated I think we should give him a chance at being a Mod.

It's just so the Staff come to a decision about it, so you don't have arguments between staff after the promotion, and then a possible demotion. That's just false hope.

And Nathan, I care because I care about Sythe. The better Sythe works, the better it grows.

 

[i <3 1 def]

Question.

Why do you care?

Because we want sythe to be run as smoothly as possible.

 

[Im Expired]

I belive thats a good idea.. About how mods should be picked but with the mods we have now no need been a playa hater on em they where picked and if they fail we all know they will be demodded so get over it guys.

 

[Tgump]

I believe this was how the old system worked with globals and such.

 

[Eh Pretty Easy]

Is it just me or did unbanned have around 400 posts like 1-2 weeks ago and now he has 1k+?

On another note, it seems that between 22.12.2008 - 24.12.2008 unbanned made 200 fucking posts, is this for real? Hahahahaha...

 

[mikeyboi]

Unbanned is doing wonderfull work.

So give him a chance.

 

[ElivOk]

I think because he does not want unbanned as a mod.


Really... Does it matter? It someone is a bad mod they will be demoted. If they are a good mod, everyone that hates them will get over themselves...

Exactly....Ub4nn3d seems to be doing a great job.

 

[Vlad]

I've stated about 5 times now that I do not mind unb4nn3d as a mod, and that he should be given a chance to proove himself, and I think he has accomplished that.

I think this would impliment a more "overall" agreeing to someone as mod, so Finn doesn't have to be embarrased if a "MatthewGor" happens again :laugh:

 

[owain jones]

Thought this was how it always worked because they do vote on a lot of things. =S

 

[Spidy99]

just let the staff worry about this

 

[dotdoubledot]

Maybe a huge vote to clarify things but dont let it all rely on that the final decision is obviously down to leaders... maybe a high class vote like trusted members +