The Titanic II

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by SuF, Apr 30, 2012.

The Titanic II
  1. Unread #21 - May 1, 2012 at 6:59 AM
  2. Brendan
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2009
    Posts:
    8,418
    Referrals:
    4
    Sythe Gold:
    18
    Sythe Awards 2012 Winner Christmas 2015 Valentine's Day 2016 Easter 2016 MushyMuncher Tier 1 Prizebox

    Brendan Your friendly neighbourhood cuck
    $50 USD Donor Retired Sectional Moderator

    The Titanic II

    Won't be any icebergs left, Global warming.

    (Trololol)

    Seriously, I was more surprised that Australia actually had anyone rich enough to do this. His investment will probably pay off considering I can see a lot of people wanting to go on it, whether an actual cruise or just while it's docked to land.
     
  3. Unread #22 - May 1, 2012 at 12:42 PM
  4. slysteeler
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,177
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    9

    slysteeler Guru
    $5 USD Donor New

    The Titanic II

    I suspect that one of the "improvements" will be enough lifeboats for everyone on board this time.

    That wasn't really much of a flaw, even many modern ships would split in half if the structure was subject those levels of stress. Titanic had a relatively modern structure for it's time, it was more because of luck that Titanic sunk, if one less compartment was punctured, it would have survived.
     
  5. Unread #23 - May 2, 2012 at 4:04 PM
  6. VendettaGP
    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Posts:
    175
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    VendettaGP Active Member
    Banned

    The Titanic II

    If I had a free ticket I would get in, I dont believe in karma and luck and stuff like that so I don't think it would have the same fate as the first Titanic
     
< New Sopa Bill | What would you do? >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site