- Joined
- Oct 4, 2023
- Sythe Gold
- 289
- Messages
- 624
- Age
- 34
Why are members at the staff Neck's all the time & Why are the Mods quite hostile towards members?
Same happens elsewhere, even admins on community servers in games. At the beginning it’s all sunshine and rainbows but later on everything becomes repetitive.
Repetitive as in the same questions being asked, same mistakes being made, same stuff happening over and over again. I know of managers in the IT business who are annoyed as hell because of the idiots they work with/for, so I assume it happens everywhere. Hell, I’m sure even in supermarkets the employees disgrace the customers and the customers disgrace the employees.I don't really get what you mean by repetitive? Has this been the way since you joint?
Repetitive as in the same questions being asked, same mistakes being made, same stuff happening over and over again. I know of managers in the IT business who are annoyed as hell because of the idiots they work with/for, so I assume it happens everywhere. Hell, I’m sure even in supermarkets the employees disgrace the customers and the customers disgrace the employees.
I think you're overreacting... any hostility you're perceiving is likely because normal users are idiots and staff are abusing their power
What tension are you seeing? Sharing some examples so we know what you're reacting to would be helpful.How do I even respond to this? I wouldn't normally Respond & just laugh it off, But don't you think there's a problem and as a community it should be fixed? I mean this tension.. It's like an bunch of old man & there ego's (No offence)
What tension are you seeing? Sharing some examples so we know what you're reacting to would be helpful.
Just to add to this, I messaged him trying to dispute it. He ignored me. so there’s another good indicator on how much staff don’t give a fuck.Would help if staff weren’t mindlessly handing out infractions for non existent rules. Perfect example is blackbasses, who infracted me for tagging a user in SF. This user had multiple comments in SF. As rules state they are likely to be attacked and not to moan. However instead of editing the rules to reflect what determines a non participating user. They just hand out infractions.
Just to add to this, I messaged him trying to dispute it. He ignored me. so there’s another good indicator on how much staff don’t give a fuck.
The issue is, we are sticking to the rules. Attacking people who have posted in the SF is totally allowed, as per rule 1 of the stickies in there. My gripe is mods enforcing non existent rules, then refusing to admit they’re wrong and correct it. Creates a huge gap between staff and user respect. so eventually you have a group of people who dislike a staff member and will 100% target them on any fuck ups they do.Not really the message we're trying to send out, It's not a thread about why innokin got a infraction, You could of just left it at your first comment & Put a comment up in a better way.
So better put:
You are thinking mods are too easily handing out infractions and this is effecting the community & when pulled up on it you're ignored? I have noticed it's the mods way or no way there's no where to vent frustration for members if you think something is bs, However it isn't helped by members who don't stick to the rules & just being dicks to people for no reason.
Would help if staff weren’t mindlessly handing out infractions for non existent rules. Perfect example is blackbasses, who infracted me for tagging a user in SF. This user had multiple comments in SF. As rules state they are likely to be attacked and not to moan. However instead of editing the rules to reflect what determines a non participating user. They just hand out infractions.
They are def biased towards some and not others, scammer reports posted by 200+ donors are always handled instantly, mean while when reports against 200+ donors they give them days and days to handle said report while the 200+ donor is still just auto bumping away ignoring the report. they can deny it all they want but take 10 seconds to look at the section and its obvious.
They are def biased towards some and not others, scammer reports posted by 200+ donors are always handled instantly, mean while when reports against 200+ donors they give them days and days to handle said report while the 200+ donor is still just auto bumping away ignoring the report. they can deny it all they want but take 10 seconds to look at the section and its obvious.

