If you want to warn someone, you can do so via PM as well. In fact, PMs pop out more to people seeing as the default is having PMs come up in pop-up messages...
It is simply common sense? The rule was made for a reason - what if the scam reports were found to be invalid or the member not guilty?
Please place a link to your proof alongside your claim. That's it. Period.
I disagree, not that my opinion matters, but the rules say,
"Accusing Someone of Scamming: without proof (text logs DO NOT COUNT AS PROOF)"
The rules don't say anything about the proof needing to be in the same topic as the accusation. Think of this situation logically for a second, the guy knew the other was a scammer, he and someone else posted a scam report on him, then he went to warn other members that he was a scammer, and he gets punished?
I can understand the mistake, Kero didn't know that he had posted a scam report and that there was proof, the dude ended up getting banned after all.
Why should a member be punished for trying to help the community whilst being within the rules?
I mean come on, think of it if you were in his shoes, and you were just trying to help out the community and had this happen. This just seems really ridiculous to me, I don't even know the OP.
Exactly whatever happened to innocent before proven guilty?

