- Joined
- Feb 27, 2013
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 1
1. First, of all the people on this site I am the only one to profess a rational ethical code and actually follow it; I am easily the most innocent of wrong doing of anyone here.
Fuck off, you are banning a heap of random people because you can give it out but you just can't take it, like a baker who hates cake but always bakes it
2. Second, I am only being attacked because I am the owner. If I were just another random user, no one would care to attack me. This is fundamentally unjust. It means you are attacking the most competent and virtuous FOR BEING the most competent and virtuous.
Lol, have you ever looked in the spam forum, everyone trolls everyone. You aren't the most competent and virtuous on here. Look in the personal support forum and you will see people who actually give a fuck. And you told me to fuck off, that's not virtuous
3. Third, the attackers use and promote their altruist ethics -- which actually are EVIL and based on nothing -- to attempt to destroy the virtue of my actions which actually are based on real ethics and are actually GOOD.
You have no fucking ethics, you make shittons off of donations and everyone knows it, and now your gonna have a little cry edit shit and say "I only make 10 gp's off my donations even after people donate like over $20000 all up
Fourth, almost every accusation presented -- ever -- I have already addressed somewhere in some thread and had to present -- unjustly -- evidence of my innocence. You people will not even grant me the basic human right or principle of logic (pick one) of presumption of innocence.
Yeah dude, what did you post about on the Finn situation
You posted words and he posted words, I am inclined to believe Finn because he had nothing to lose
Fuck off, you are banning a heap of random people because you can give it out but you just can't take it, like a baker who hates cake but always bakes it
2. Second, I am only being attacked because I am the owner. If I were just another random user, no one would care to attack me. This is fundamentally unjust. It means you are attacking the most competent and virtuous FOR BEING the most competent and virtuous.
Lol, have you ever looked in the spam forum, everyone trolls everyone. You aren't the most competent and virtuous on here. Look in the personal support forum and you will see people who actually give a fuck. And you told me to fuck off, that's not virtuous
3. Third, the attackers use and promote their altruist ethics -- which actually are EVIL and based on nothing -- to attempt to destroy the virtue of my actions which actually are based on real ethics and are actually GOOD.
You have no fucking ethics, you make shittons off of donations and everyone knows it, and now your gonna have a little cry edit shit and say "I only make 10 gp's off my donations even after people donate like over $20000 all up
Fourth, almost every accusation presented -- ever -- I have already addressed somewhere in some thread and had to present -- unjustly -- evidence of my innocence. You people will not even grant me the basic human right or principle of logic (pick one) of presumption of innocence.
Yeah dude, what did you post about on the Finn situation
You posted words and he posted words, I am inclined to believe Finn because he had nothing to lose
