Syria.
- Thread starter Jellee
- Start date
God bless Syria I'm from Lebanon which is near Syria and things are starting to happen in north Lebanon which is bad & they have to sort it out before it gets any worse but inshallah everything starts to get better some time soon !
Congressmen can argue all they want, this shouldn't be happening. Brings tears to my eyes, what these people have to deal with from their own fucking government. We can only pray, no matter what God you believe in, and hope this mess is cleaned up before more blood is spilled.
American government and media rolling out the propaganda train again....seriously Obama is just as bad as bush. Both should be ashamed and be put in jail. Course money runs politics. Donor's get what they want.
They are just trying to cripple the middle east and get to iran pretty obvious if you look at this situation, they probably were the ones to give them the chemical weapons just like they funded al quida but my prayers go to those suffering in syria right now
Buy high, sell low
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 98
- Messages
- 2,736
Divide and conquer, that's what they're doing since the 90's. Lucky people now start to think about the VS propaganda train. However defense contractors and some sketchy oil companies do great business in unstable regions lately. Source (look in what region and when they signed their contracts)
Ow btw, Dutch chemical companies are doing great business these days.
Proof on 0.33 (Chemical suits from The Netherlands)
Analysts are telling this could be escalating in a shot time. Iran has over 100k cruise missiles which can bring down the 4 warships within 1 hr after and American bombardment on Syria, they wouldn't hassle about doing this. Also the Russians who're in Syria uses very modern anti-air equipment.
If it escalates their might be some nukes falling from the Sky.
Cheers!
Ow btw, Dutch chemical companies are doing great business these days.
Proof on 0.33 (Chemical suits from The Netherlands)
Analysts are telling this could be escalating in a shot time. Iran has over 100k cruise missiles which can bring down the 4 warships within 1 hr after and American bombardment on Syria, they wouldn't hassle about doing this. Also the Russians who're in Syria uses very modern anti-air equipment.
If it escalates their might be some nukes falling from the Sky.
Cheers!
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2013
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 57
really said, the US government should really take quick action.
Loyal 2 da game
Formerly known as Loyal To The Game
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2006
- Sythe Gold
- 672
- Messages
- 4,691
If you're American, email your local congressman about how you do not wish for them to support attacking Syria.
Buy high, sell low
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 98
- Messages
- 2,736
Why action, is it so hard to let de UN do their work? If take action, why quick without let the world see your (self edited) proof? This is the 21th report of chemical attacks.
+1
Just to do everyone out there this isn't a debate the OP is showing us a video to show what's currently going on in Syria. And, if you don't know anything about a topic don't make a fictional statement about it with your made up facts. It's bad enough as it is we don't need to spread propoganda either. Not gonna name names here.
Buy high, sell low
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 98
- Messages
- 2,736
I assume I've something to do with your reply. Therefore I can make this reply, that's what happens on forums, discussions. This video is about the use of chemical weapons, we can openly discus all sub topics in this thread.
When posting 'Sources' with links to construct a valid argument doesn't make a fictional statement, don't you think?
Shit happens all over the world. The fact that less then 9% of the Americans supports the attack on Syria (Source) can not make that Fox and other Rupert Murdoch owned companies are showing pro-invasion-people in their interviews, maybe to gain more support from citizens? It looks like a huge propaganda machine to me, let me know if I'm wrong.
Cheers!
With regards to the post about WW3 and the countries mentioned; There will be no WW3. A war of that caliber will encourage the use of Nuclear Weapons. There is no arguing nuclear weapons, once they're used we have assured Armageddon for all. The drone strikes on Syria are a shit idea, but I can admit to not having a situation thought up myself. Right now I'm sure Obama is talking to his financial advisers, talking about how much the economy will be hit by the attack. I'm sure the rebels are ruthless too, killing any innocents opposed to the new proposed government. My prayers go out to the innocent civilians, stuck in a very catastrophic civil war.
That's why theres something called the United Nations. I already reported that post, and it has been dealt with lol. Clear-cut spam, and I don't understand how you can make a comment with that calibre of idiocy.
It's not a discussion anymore it's rather argumentative we can't have a discussion if your facts are fictional. Can we?
Media sources have been shown to be unreliable many times their sources aren't always correct and they don't confirm it, but due to the fact people are fed this information it leads them to believe all the propoganda the media feeds people.
Exactly, that's because few people support the fighting in Syria. And, they didn't get an exact number from every American in the US did they? Can't be an accurate survey then can it? Which is exactly what I'm saying it's all propoganda people thinking American's are crooked and corrupt, etc. You are however supporting this which makes me wonder why you just confessed to it being propoganda. If you get some factual evidence hit me up for a chat.
"I don't understand how you can make a comment with that caliber of idiocy"
I thought your choice of words there was kinda funny. I disagree, the UN is absolute bullshit. The idea of a United Nations to stand for the people and make decisions in times like these, great. The actual practice of the UN isn't as great as it was made out to be. I don't think they give enough support to the people. It's hard for the UN to stick up for anyone, there are no clear cut innocents with all the rebels, and the UN can't side with either the rebels or the government. It's a lose lose. Syria needs more than the UN.
With regards to you calling my post spam, I think you misunderstand the term. Spam reports are to be filed when a post is made when a certain user contributes nothing to the thread or contributes irrelevant bullshit in order to increase post count. I was adding to a discussion about world politics, absolutely relevant to the OP.
~ Interested to hear the response.
I didn't post a spam report on you I posted it against the guy with that shit post about WW3. And obviously the UN isn't gonna supply troops to either side. Why, so they can get them killed for no reason? This is something they have to settle on their own. The UN is not the best, but atleast it's keeping everything intact so their won't be a possibility of a WW3 they aren't saints they are just keeping the peace. Also, my statement of words made sense -,-. Take a look at the Lebanese conflict for example look at what America intervening to make peace did hundreds if not thousands of soldiers were killed. Also, my post is completely relevant to the OP.
Oh, that post that guy made about WW3 was an absolute shit spam post. I just figure that since I followed up my response with relevant discussion, my reply was just fine. It's my opinion, we're allowed to disagree.
Onto business. I think the UN isn't enough for this country. I'll be the first to agree with you, US intervention would be catastrophic. USA has butt into too many governmental issues and Civil Wars. Cuba. Chile. Panama. But you cannot just sit back and say they need to figure it out themselves, when their own people are being gassed by the government. It is such a horrific death, I can only imagine the suffering. You can almost compare this to Sadam Huessain and his bullshit with the Kurds. Too many people are dying, and the people rely on outside influence to help them out of their situation.
The UN's involvement with Civil Wars has been strange. Take Rwanda for example, The Hutu people were exterminating the Tutsi people by the masses. Absolute genocide. The basis for all of it was with the Belgium withdraw, giving immense power to a minority, a big nono. The UN had 500 troops to protect those people, with strict orders not to fire. 500 people. 0 reinforcements. The Tutsi refugees fled to surrounding African countries, resulting in more conflict between differing people (Zaire) and led to more and more displacement.
The world is a fucked up place. These people need help, but helping them is wrong. It's a big circle to me.
Gonna keep this brief for you. The United Nations sent peacekeepers not troops originally to Rwanda then they send troops later but pulled them out because hey it's pointless to intervene in the conflict you're only gonna make it worse. And, yes sitting back and letting them deal with it is the only way this will end. If we send in troops or peacekeepers it will only cause more spite and hate towards us. If you looked at Lebanon they had a devestating situation, but after a while it ended with a treaty. Now, I'm not saying I don't mind if people are getting killed, etc. I'm just saying their war is none of our buisness, and we shouldn't intensify the already burning flames, sure we can change the outcome of the war, but to what extent? If the rebels won what would happen? You'd have to think about this all logically, we can't go in gung ho and stop the issue.
I'll keep it even briefer, it's about my bed time 
Peacekeepers are as useful as soldiers without weapons. They look mean, but aren't allowed to shoot and protect. I'm not going to argue that we need to intervene, I agree we need to hope they can figure shit out before the government's terrorist attacks get even worse. I have no side to argue for, I just point out the flaws in both points of view.
Closing sentiments; Syria, get your shit together. You too Egypt. Obama's getting the Cruise missiles ready...
Peacekeepers are as useful as soldiers without weapons. They look mean, but aren't allowed to shoot and protect. I'm not going to argue that we need to intervene, I agree we need to hope they can figure shit out before the government's terrorist attacks get even worse. I have no side to argue for, I just point out the flaws in both points of view.
Closing sentiments; Syria, get your shit together. You too Egypt. Obama's getting the Cruise missiles ready...