Superfluous's Feedback

[zorro_]

Almost everyone does this in sfa.. This place has become a joke honestly.

Yeah I agree. But honestly I feel that my post was decent quality and it's bs that it got deleted. The guy was making a sexist post disguised with nice talk and I called him out on it, and I even went so far as to criticize all posts which generalize in such a way. I think it was perfect SFA material. I feel like my post was infracted because I used "Lol" - for this reason my post was not considered genuine.

 

[Superfluous]

i removed it because it wasn't contributing to the discussion. essentially, if your post is one line long and not a direct response to a conversation you were involved in prior, you shouldn't post it in sfa

 

Great guy, Gets stuff done fast

 

[nodnarbusn]

Use this and I'll leave positive feedback.

You have 24 hours, or I'll say mean things about you in SF.

 

[Superfluous]

am i allowed to use that without paying him for it? if so, i'll request the change to it later tonight

 

[Tyler]

Your actually really active in suggestions, feedback and sythe support forums.

Shows your very roary-like.


Good job superfloos

Superflius
...superflouu



Good job.

 

[uJesternWind]

Killing it in RaSp mang

 

am i allowed to use that without paying him for it? if so, i'll request the change to it later tonight

I don't think he asked for payment haha.

OT: All you need to know about superfluous's activity. Keep it up mate

 

[yz8]

I don't mind anyone on sythe, everyone's a great character .... but this guy.. no offense.. is a douche/rogue mod. Takes his role as if he is trying to impress the president or something , even normal authorities aren't as rogue as this guy. I got infracted for writing constructive responses to threads I was interested in for "spam" then threatened by a ban. In b4 I get banned for leaving feedback...? Hopefully this guy understands that this is just a forum and if people choose to use it to "interact" with one another in actual conversations and not 5 letter responses , they should not be infracted and ban threatened. Every other staff is perfectly fine other than this guy no offense to him , I'm sure he's just doing his "job".

 

[Superfluous]

i infracted you for this: http://puu.sh/jvhwz.png
and warned you for this: http://puu.sh/jvhyd.png
and i pmed you telling you to stop spamming because you've posted 125 times in the last 3 days. so yeah, those aren't constructive posts, one is spam, and the other is just stupid

 

[yz8]

i infracted you for this: http://puu.sh/jvhwz.png
and warned you for this: http://puu.sh/jvhyd.png
and i pmed you telling you to stop spamming because you've posted 125 times in the last 3 days. so yeah, those aren't constructive posts, one is spam, and the other is just stupid

"Not a unique name" is considered spam under names category? What should the response have been ? It was a realistic and honest response that will help the seller understand why there is a lack of interest in the sale. The second post ,stupid? If you have any understanding of politics and economics you would understand that companies influence political standings and candidate support is based on candidate ideologies that support a certain company and promote their business. You are the one making a "stupid" comment here by infracting a user who is doing nothing other than exercising his rights to post on a public forum . Nazi enforcement has always been laughed at because those same enforcers lack "power" in their life and as a result, to feel relevant and have some sort of "control", they exercise their "working" power. Hopefully you, instead of arrogantly responding to my post, read it and give yourself a fair minute to think about it. I'm not going to respond to this thread or your response anymore ,as that, then will be considered "spam".

Edit ; not trying to start drama here either , this section requests an individual Staff evaluation , this was mine. If you disagree with it, that's okay, if you agree with it, that is also okay. Only writing this because I have the utter most feeling that you will ban me just because you are un-satisfied with negative feedback. I guess I will see what you will do when you do it.

 

[Superfluous]

you shouldn't post anything if you're not negotiating with the seller. people can sell whatever they want for whatever price they want. if no one bites on the offer the seller is making, it's not gonna sell, they adjust their price or they get left out altogether, and that's the way the market works. if they ask "why isn't my xyz selling?" in market disc, then you can post whatever you want about your thoughts regarding their inability to sell things.

both of your posts (ttb removed the other one btw) in name sales threads about names not being rare were made on posts where no claims about rarity were made. one guy said his name was "legit"; this isn't the same as "super rare". at most you should report the threads and ask for words like "rare" to be taken out of the title if the name is not rare, but posting is unnecessary and spam.

---

you didn't get infracted for the companies post, i warned you for posting a somewhat spammy reply. yes, it's true that governmental actions shape the sphere that firms operate in, but your reply didn't really address that in a logical way; if you'd posted what you posted above ^ in that thread, your post would have been totally fine and then some. tl;dr - you posted an idea without connecting it to what the op of the thread was asking. i warned you, not infracted you, for this because your post was reasonable, just not immediately evidently connected. as a side note, we're in this weird phase of trying to decide what sorts of posts are allowed in gen disc, so you kind of got caught up in that. apparently we're being more lenient now. in any case, your infraction, and all infractions, expire in a month and have no long-term bearing on your account as long as you don't get 5+ within a 30-day period.

and np, i don't mind the negative feedback. no one's going to ban you for posting things like what you've been posting. i don't mean to stifle you adding content to the site, i just meant to alert you that some of what you're doing is spam and it should stop; 95% of your posts are totally fine, but the frequency (100+ in 3 days) is atypical.

hope that clarifies. i dont remember the last time i made a post with so many words and paragraphs in it lol

 

[yz8]

you shouldn't post anything if you're not negotiating with the seller. people can sell whatever they want for whatever price they want. if no one bites on the offer the seller is making, it's not gonna sell, they adjust their price or they get left out altogether, and that's the way the market works. if they ask "why isn't my xyz selling?" in market disc, then you can post whatever you want about your thoughts regarding their inability to sell things.

both of your posts (ttb removed the other one btw) in name sales threads about names not being rare were made on posts where no claims about rarity were made. one guy said his name was "legit"; this isn't the same as "super rare". at most you should report the threads and ask for words like "rare" to be taken out of the title if the name is not rare, but posting is unnecessary and spam.

---

you didn't get infracted for the companies post, i warned you for posting a somewhat spammy reply. yes, it's true that governmental actions shape the sphere that firms operate in, but your reply didn't really address that in a logical way; if you'd posted what you posted above ^ in that thread, your post would have been totally fine and then some. tl;dr - you posted an idea without connecting it to what the op of the thread was asking. i warned you, not infracted you, for this because your post was reasonable, just not immediately evidently connected. as a side note, we're in this weird phase of trying to decide what sorts of posts are allowed in gen disc, so you kind of got caught up in that. apparently we're being more lenient now. in any case, your infraction, and all infractions, expire in a month and have no long-term bearing on your account as long as you don't get 5+ within a 30-day period.

and np, i don't mind the negative feedback. no one's going to ban you for posting things like what you've been posting. i don't mean to stifle you adding content to the site, i just meant to alert you that some of what you're doing is spam and it should stop; 95% of your posts are totally fine, but the frequency (100+ in 3 days) is atypical.

hope that clarifies. i dont remember the last time i made a post with so many words and paragraphs in it lol

If this was your response to my infraction rather than ''next time is ban'', i would have much more appreciated you for infracting me as i would actually be aware of the circumstance. Thank you for considering my responses and responding, i apologize behalf the ''spam''. I may have gotten caught up in the forums too much and wanted to build up my activity faster than i should have. Change my mind on you, everyone on sythe is great. Future tip ; don't msg people with a 4 word comment that the person may be banned, that will automatically incite poor behavior towards the sender. In this case, it was me, i apologize for the dramatization of what probably was a small incident. Have a good day, gz on moderator.

edit; you may remove my past responses to this thread if you would like.

 

[nodnarbusn]

am i allowed to use that without paying him for it? if so, i'll request the change to it later tonight

You lied. Or Matthew's really slow, or both.

Anyways, this : www.sythe.org/report-spammer-archive/1869473-reported-post-mootrucks.html killed me.

On a more serious note your activity in your sections is up and you've done great cleaning them up. Good yob superflucious.

 

For some reason you feel it is necessary to have people prove they've swapped certain amounts in order to change their title threads. I don't see how putting, 150B+ 07 Swapped, in my title thread to be against any rules, none under the Gold Swapping section http://www.sythe.org/gold-swapping-services/1689296-gold-swapping-services-rules-safe-practices.html, there's no rules about title changes and what is allowed, http://sythe.org/sythe-org-news/148431-official-sythe-org-rules.html.

I don't understand why you would disregard a title change, because you feel you need proof? Is this a normal thing?

It's actually annoying that you disregarded me wanting a simple title change, because Travis didn't fully acknowledge my second request to put 150B+ 07, to which I had sent that request in again. Also the fact that we have to wait a few days or so for a title change can also affect the persons business as well. You may be aware of the gold swapping business. Hence why I feel it is annoying that you disregarded my request.

It's not exactly a vouch, so I don't see how I need to prove it..either?

http://www.sythe.org/report-spammer-archive/1873141-reported-post-sonia.html

 

[Biofighter]

It's not exactly a vouch, so I don't see how I need to prove it..either?

Sure it's not a sythe using writing "vouch" on your thread; but it still acts as a reputation booster - which can be answered with the rule below:

NB: Offsite vouches are not honored or allowed on sythe.

As much as I'm bias in your favor Sonia, in this situation Superfluous\Travis are correct; there have been countless sythe ban evaders\scammers who claim to be rolling in the offsite vouches, trying to prey on those who are trusting or new.
Now clearly I'm not stating you're one of those people but having 150B+swapped without the sythe vouches to show it will just add more issues for the mods with the numerous reports\twc requests being filed to your name.

I'd simply say put your screenshots (Which I know you have plenty of) in your thread + the vouch from bert and other notable members.

Of course I'm not superfluous so I can't speak for his logic behind it; this is just my $0.02

 

[Superfluous]

For some reason you feel it is necessary to have people prove they've swapped certain amounts in order to change their title threads. I don't see how putting, 150B+ 07 Swapped, in my title thread to be against any rules, none under the Gold Swapping section http://www.sythe.org/gold-swapping-services/1689296-gold-swapping-services-rules-safe-practices.html, there's no rules about title changes and what is allowed, http://sythe.org/sythe-org-news/148431-official-sythe-org-rules.html.

I don't understand why you would disregard a title change, because you feel you need proof? Is this a normal thing?

It's actually annoying that you disregarded me wanting a simple title change, because Travis didn't fully acknowledge my second request to put 150B+ 07, to which I had sent that request in again. Also the fact that we have to wait a few days or so for a title change can also affect the persons business as well. You may be aware of the gold swapping business. Hence why I feel it is annoying that you disregarded my request.

It's not exactly a vouch, so I don't see how I need to prove it..either?

http://www.sythe.org/report-spammer-archive/1873141-reported-post-sonia.html

yeah, i swapped for a year so i know the market well. we don't allow people to put "4513515+ vouches" in their titles because it's misleading. show me any evidence that you're swapped remotely near 150b 07 in the three weeks that you've had your thread open (or offsite, if you have an offsite presence a la oakdice) and i'll happily change it, but i think it's a false claim, which is why you got denied.

and bio's pretty accurate as well

 

Sure it's not a sythe using writing "vouch" on your thread; but it still acts as a reputation booster - which can be answered with the rule below:



As much as I'm bias in your favor Sonia, in this situation Superfluous\Travis are correct; there have been countless sythe ban evaders\scammers who claim to be rolling in the offsite vouches, trying to prey on those who are trusting or new.
Now clearly I'm not stating you're one of those people but having 150B+swapped without the sythe vouches to show it will just add more issues for the mods with the numerous reports\twc requests being filed to your name.

I'd simply say put your screenshots (Which I know you have plenty of) in your thread + the vouch from bert and other notable members.

Of course I'm not superfluous so I can't speak for his logic behind it; this is just my $0.02

>.> Gonna be totally fun to deal with them screenshots.
Blast from the past.

Thank You, makes much more sense now.

yeah, i swapped for a year so i know the market well. we don't allow people to put "4513515+ vouches" in their titles because it's misleading. show me any evidence that you're swapped remotely near 150b 07 in the three weeks that you've had your thread open (or offsite, if you have an offsite presence a la oakdice) and i'll happily change it, but i think it's a false claim, which is why you got denied.

and bio's pretty accurate as well

Alright, sorry kind of hard to read between the lines.

Shall look forward to it. Thanks.

 

[Bacterial]

I'd rather him acted more nicely, he's fairly active, but sometimes a bit arrogant. You're a cool guy, but you could improve your attitude a bit imo

 

[Superfluous]

Great job on everything!

Thanks!