summoning with mad necklace

[Tassathy]

What is more better for saving money?

Doing crims and blues or golds or does it not matter

EDIT: I'm 59summoning

 

[CreativeNub]

Most likely crimsons and blues. What pouches are you making though?

 

[Silent Fang]

it doesnt matter... just golds will take more time to get the full 200k exp. but its so worth using mad necklass on summoning

 

[Neil Trades]

Crimsons, it's faster and should be cheaper in the long run.

 

[kingsleyeng]

Crimsons, it's faster and should be cheaper in the long run.

^^^^^^
agree

 

[|Barbershop|]

If you have golds, this would make them and reliable form of experience(close to crimsons?).

So i would use golds, because: Yes, you use longer time to reach the 200k exp limit, BUT, you wil still get free 200k exp from it, and this will be and bigger advantage from golds because they're not as good exp as crims without the necklace...

My point being that you will utilize a form of less experience to achieve greater exp, contra using it with crims wich would only get you fast experience.

 

[Rafii]

Depends on what you'e making tbh

 

[Apith]

Crimsons and Blues if you're around level 80+. Because Gold is little exp and isn't really worth the GP and time imo, I just stock them in case I am a little short on a level. So I basically treat them as a back up. The same with green, greens just cost too much and gives little exp per hour.

It's the same, I don't see why anyone would even think it's a better idea to use double exp on gold charms. In the end, you get the same results.

 

[Niico1993]

Doesn't really matter, and for all of you that say using gold's is a waste- I used 5k golds on my way to 96 summoning, only took me ONE HOUR to use all of my golds doing barker toads in taverly by selling the toads to the vendor and buying back.

 

[yujee]

do crims or blues
gold is slow/bad xp and a waste of money

 

[Tassathy]

I'm only 59summoning guys.