Staff restructure

[Coinshare]

Good job Sythe, I'm still with the others who posted above me about the new staff rule. Clarification please

 

[Govind]

Aside from Sin666's promotion to special advisor, most of this is not much different from what the admin structure was before.

Finn, Giverny and I deal with community, staff and market related issues; Sythe and Matthew take care of technical aspects of the site that cannot be addressed within vBulletin, and are the only people who have ever been allowed to manage administrator permissions... as far as I'm aware that is not any different from how things were before.

 

[JohnK]

Cheers Sythe.

 

[Karl]

Aside from Sin666's promotion to special advisor, most of this is not much different from what the admin structure was before.

Finn, Giverny and I deal with community, staff and market related issues; Sythe and Matthew take care of technical aspects of the site that cannot be addressed within vBulletin, and are the only people who have ever been allowed to manage administrator permissions... as far as I'm aware that is not any different from how things were before.

and ofcourse the new rule.

Thanks Sythe

 

[Bubba Fuzz]

I love sin. New rule is also pretty boss.

 

Huzzah, fear me and my general administration powers.

 

[Alteranz]

Huzzah, fear me and my general administration powers.

Psshhh, you aint got nothing!

 

[Sin666]

Huzzah, fear me and my general administration powers.

And fear my ability to advise her what to do with them!

...and also, what kind of things would you be talking about? Typically if a staff member broke a rule, they would always be punished. I don't recall many/any exemptions...

I believe it refers to lesser offenses (ie, staff being bound to restrictions regarding bumping, flaming, etc). Since it's impractical to infract staff, a lot of these rules aren't typically enforced; I assume the rule is intended to remind that they still apply, however.

 

And fear my ability to advise her what to do with them!

*whip cracking sounds*

In all seriousness though, it's exciting to have 1/3 of the admin team in possession of ovaries.

 

[Wolfdog]

^^ This.

I rather like this new arrangement, it balances out some things and makes others far more clear.

 

[OldFinn]

In all seriousness though, it's exciting to have 1/3 of the admin team in possession of ovaries.

:sick:

Anyway... cheers for clarifying & codifying this!

 

[I_DONT_BOT]

Sythe, shouldn't FireZ become on the donations list?

 

[spots13]

I'm glad to see this, hope sin get's back to her admin spot but well, thanks for letting us know

 

Thanks, Sythe!

 

[Imagine]

Thank you for this
and congrats to sin if she decides to become admin.

 

[WeRnIE]

Very nice. Thanks Sythe.

Also, change the thread icon to yellow partyhat. Because now it looks as a normal/typical thread.

 

[SuF]

I believe it refers to lesser offenses (ie, staff being bound to restrictions regarding bumping, flaming, etc). Since it's impractical to infract staff, a lot of these rules aren't typically enforced; I assume the rule is intended to remind that they still apply, however.

That's completely right since sectionals can not infract sectionals or globals or admins it makes the day to day enforcement of minor rules hard.

But really, this hasn't changed much other than simply making connections that were always there official and written down, to be honest.

 

[Dave.]

Good changes, i hope they are strictly enforced.

 

[Rsaccounttrader]

Thanks for this, Sythe and Matthew!
ohh...and grats Sin!

 

[FireZ]

Sythe, shouldn't FireZ become on the donations list?

This is a admin structure, not a global structure. Also I simply collect donations, I have zero control over perks and requests.