Squire ruling inconsistent

[Unfair ruling]

The ruling on @Squire here is unfair. He should not have had to pay 500m because precedent was set here: Imposter - Resolved

In this thread @Burnley, who was an OFFICIAL SYTHE MIDDLEMAN, posted incorrect UID and was not required to repay the victim who added the wrong ID off his MM thread.

Either @Squire should be owed his 500m back or @Burnley owes money. It can’t be both ways.

 

[Unfair ruling]

Sorry linked wrong thread for precedent. See here: burnley (official middleman) scammed me 220m

 

[Unfair ruling]

Not only was the precedent set here: burnley (official middleman) scammed me 220m

but the SAME mod set the precedent.

@Pikachu owes @Squire 500m or @Burnley owes @Walrus X 220m. Can’t be both ways

 

[President]

This is the scam report section, reserved for the situations described in the general rules and stickies. Rulings are final and if you have any feedback, you can contact the parties or arbitrator himself.

Please refrain from making these posts here and read the stickies.