Spam Forum being strangled

[Corey]

Detriment is just a nice way of saying we don't want people like "you" here. Which to be honest can interpret to being a threat to the site. Its just the same as instead of saying whore you say a money hungry woman who will expose her body to reach her goals. This whole thing was a mess and the community isn't alone to blame and even now Elena's report is still being held above and beyond what similar situations have resulted in. If any other person with her join date, post count and market involvement was reported with the same evidence they would have been immediately banned even her report the person was banned before she even fulfilled the scam report requirement.

I don't know what it is but she has half the staff team on a leash.

I admit that I may not have went about everything last night in the best manner, but everything that I did was warranted, and that's fact. I do apologize for my hastiness in calling Magic Arrow a detriment to the site, and the rude manner in which I replied to some of the threads I closed. I was not in a good mood last night, so I'm sorry.

Regardless though, those threads did need to be closed, as I am not going to have users quit this site just because other users want to harass them. There never will be rules against having fun in the spam forum by trolling or harassing other users (except those already in place), but be prepared to have the thread closed if the user complains.

I agree with you, that user should not have been banned until proper proof was posted, but that's something you should take up with Yaroow.

 

[Raptor lx]

By your logic, half of the threads in the SF warrant closure if the proper people pm'd you. If they were so inclined, those threads could be linked to you along with claims of feeling harassed, and these threads would have to be locked. I didn't participate in this whole Elena ordeal, but your logic here is flawed. As long as any flaming or whatnot that takes place in the SF isn't TOO bad, threads do not need to be locked, especially if the OP is not a flaming post.

 

[Corey]

By your logic, half of the threads in the SF warrant closure if the proper people pm'd you. If they were so inclined, those threads could be linked to you along with claims of feeling harassed, and these threads would have to be locked. I didn't participate in this whole Elena ordeal, but your logic here is flawed. As long as any flaming or whatnot that takes place in the SF isn't TOO bad, threads do not need to be locked, especially if the OP is not a flaming post.

They won't be, unless its clear that the thread is causing problems.

 

[JohnK]

They won't be, unless its clear that the thread is causing problems.

what type of problems? how does a thread aimed at calling elena a faggot cause problems anyway?

if they are here to use the market to make money, that wont stop them leaving the site.

 

[Corey]

what type of problems? how does a thread aimed at calling elena a faggot cause problems anyway?

if they are here to use the market to make money, that wont stop them leaving the site.

Generally it doesn't, I initially told her to just wait it out and that it'll go away eventually, but I guess she just got sick of it and was actually going to leave the site, so I had to do something. I'd rather not lose a member of the site just to keep a few threads open.

 

[I KO I]

I told him he was a detriment to this site because of all the stupid threads he was posting. I'm sure he will get over it.

And then you blow up about simple threads making fun of a user. Because you obviously haven't gotten over these past few days.

When threads like these have been occurring for an inevitable long time but when it happens to be about a FEMALE, then it's not fun anymore.

Every single damn example of past users that have been given shit in the SF didn't receiver this kind of treatment from a mod. In fact, mods even participated.

Yet when the the opposite sex comes up, and people are attracted to her, then it gets personal, disorderly, and biased.

She's putting herself out there to get trolled, made fun of, harassed, etc. She even ASKED FOR IT.

She's asking for hate and as well as love.

The SF may be by definition not about, trolling, making fun of, harassing others, etc.

But the NATURE as of late of the SF is about that. If it's clearly been going against the rules of the SF for a long time, why suddenly crack down on it when we have a female involved.

I mean fuck, if this happened in any real life social setting, she would be labeled as a bitch by GUYS AND GIRLS alike.

I'm not saying I dislike her, hell, I hardly know her, but the controversy that she has been causing, damn, you can't ignore that.

Just moderate regardless of sex, regardless of if you like the person or not, because having a pic of her in anyone's sig and then when you STRONGLY support her, even going so far as ignoring your mistakes and sometimes blindly making decisions which makes it seem as if you made it out of emotions for the user instead of by a logical point of view.

Personally, I wouldn't have a pic of a user in my sig, it's going to cause controversy when you have a position of power and you're ruling in favor of said person, it just screams bias and that you're emotionally attached to that person.

Although, people would still be pissed off as hell regardless of the pic since such an event hasn't been handled in such a way. Since it's going against the nature and status quo of the spam forum.

 

[Corey]

And then you blow up about simple threads making fun of a user. Because you obviously haven't gotten over these past few days.

When threads like these have been occurring for an inevitable long time but when it happens to be about a FEMALE, then it's not fun anymore.

Every single damn example of past users that have been given shit in the SF didn't receiver this kind of treatment from a mod. In fact, mods even participated.

Yet when the the opposite sex comes up, and people are attracted to her, then it gets personal, disorderly, and biased.

She's putting herself out there to get trolled, made fun of, harassed, etc. She even ASKED FOR IT.

She's asking for hate and as well as love.

The SF may be by definition not about, trolling, making fun of, harassing others, etc.

But the NATURE as of late of the SF is about that. If it's clearly been going against the rules of the SF for a long time, why suddenly crack down on it when we have a female involved.

I mean fuck, if this happened in any real life social setting, she would be labeled as a bitch by GUYS AND GIRLS alike.

I'm not saying I dislike her, hell, I hardly know her, but the controversy that she has been causing, damn, you can't ignore that.

Just moderate regardless of sex, regardless of if you like the person or not, because having a pic of her in anyone's sig and then when you STRONGLY support her, even going so far as ignoring your mistakes and sometimes blindly making decisions which makes it seem as if you made it out of emotions for the user instead of by a logical point of view.

Personally, I wouldn't have a pic of a user in my sig, it's going to cause controversy when you have a position of power and you're ruling in favor of said person, it just screams bias and that you're emotionally attached to that person.

Although, people would still be pissed off as hell regardless of the pic since such an event hasn't been handled in such a way. Since it's going against the nature and status quo of the spam forum.

I think its time you read through this thread, because just about everything you said was said by someone else and already responded to.

Thanks.

 

[mage3158]

I'll unban Magic Arrow, but I hope he doesn't choose to go on a rampage like last night.

What about your rampage? Will there be any sort of consequence for wrongly banning people and acting like a douchebag to users?

 

[Corey]

What about your rampage? Will there be any sort of consequence for wrongly banning people and acting like a douchebag to users?

Nobody was wrongly banned, and there's no rules against being a douchebag to users, however I did apologize for it.

Im not replying to anymore of your posts, as you're just posting simply because you don't like me. Have a nice day.

 

[I KO I]

Nobody was wrongly banned, and there's no rules against being a douchebag to users, however I did apologize for it.

Im not replying to anymore of your posts, as you're just posting simply because you don't like me. Have a nice day.

Then why can't we be a"douchebag" to users that we don't like without our threads getting locked?

Because there isn't a rule that says, "threads will be locked when user is being "douchebagged" on by fellow users."

 

[Cynthia]

You did the right thing Corey, if someone feels harassed they know they can always PM you or any mod to have the appropriate thread locked.

 

[Corey]

Then why can't we be a"douchebag" to users that we don't like without our threads getting locked?

Because there isn't a rule that says, "threads will be locked when user is being "douchebagged" on by fellow users."

You're free to make all the threads about users in the spam forum that you like, but the minute that one complains that they don't like it, its gone (if it really is causing problems).

The reason we don't lock them unless the person complains (or at least I dont), is because sometimes the person that the thread is about doesn't care because they're just joking around.

If you'd rather users quit the site than have a few threads closed, you're welcome to make a suggestion. (no, not really)

 

[I KO I]

You're free to make all the threads about users in the spam forum that you like, but the minute that one complains that they don't like it, its gone (if it really is causing problems).

The reason we don't lock them unless the person complains (or at least I dont), is because sometimes the person that the thread is about doesn't care because they're just joking around.

If you'd rather users quit the site than have a few threads closed, you're welcome to make a suggestion. (no, not really)

http://www.sythe.org/feedback/1506859-people-harrasing-me-forum.html

Except that when someone does complain about being harassed, nothing happens, they end up quitting, mod rules in favor.

Double edged sword much?

Plus, he wasn't on TC.

Everyone is asking for a level playing field, no favorites, gender involved in decisions, no bs.

 

[Corey]

That was already discussed in this thread. Please read the thread before posting.

 

[I KO I]

That was already discussed in this thread. Please read the thread before posting.

Except that I'm pointing out the fact that he wasn't on TC considering I was and if it was really him, he would have attacked me considering the shit that I posted in his thread.

I even tried to talk to him on there and he didn't even know who I was.

Yet, he would have if it really was him.

Hence, there's a double edged sword in terms of the past events.

 

[Corey]

Except that I'm pointing out the fact that he wasn't on TC considering I was and if it was really him, he would have attacked me considering the shit that I posted in his thread.

I even tried to talk to him on there and he didn't even know who I was.

Yet, he would have if it really was him.

Hence, there's a double edged sword in terms of the past events.

I'm not going to take the heat for something that was dealt with by other staff members. This thread is about me and my actions so please keep anything non-relevant out of it.

Just saying though, if that really was him and he was on TC harassing users, I wouldn't pity him either.

 

[mage3158]

That was already discussed in this thread. Please read the thread before posting.

Please remind me, what was your excuse for Virus again?

 

[tgnDean]

You're free to make all the threads about users in the spam forum that you like

So what is this? Again we all know you apologized for being a dick and everything. It was causing problems for a single user who wanted all this attention.

Again, had it been a random newcomer "whining" as most of the staff have called it in this thread, you wouldn't have done anything unless several of us complained about it like we are now.

Like others have said, time to level the playing field.

 

[Corey]

Please remind me, what was your excuse for Virus again?

Please do not spam this thread. Infractions will be handed out soon if this keeps up.

 

Please do not spam this thread. Infractions will be handed out soon if this keeps up.

It's relative to the thread and the matter at hand. Just because a user may not like you does not mean you can exclude them from the thread with threats. It is an example of this:

Corey just reminds me of another Finn. He governs with emotion and not logic.

It's also a form of censorship which you have exhibited in the spam forum yesterday and are now bringing into this thread.