xxthebeastxx
Guru

- Joined
- May 17, 2008
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 1,680
If mai teacher had a gun he would kill himself.


A double negative is not even remotely a positive...it's a negative, obviously, and I have heard of the term.
What I'm trying to get across is that, you will solve nothing by having teachers carry weaponry around the school, in case of the 3% chance that a deranged outcast goes bonkers and decides to kill every one. More harm than good would come of it.
Also:
Sorry if this comes off the wrong way, but are you getting some kind of pleasure out of this? 0_0


No, but there should be more security in high crime area schools. I can just see it now, some kid grabbing the teacher's gun and killing everyone in class.

I think the greater question at hand here is:
Should children be forced, by law, to attend an institution that is potentially unsafe for them?
No.

What is 2 - (-2)?



A double negative is not even remotely a positive...it's a negative, obviously, and I have heard of the term.
What I'm trying to get across is that, you will solve nothing by having teachers carry weaponry around the school, in case of the 3% chance that a deranged outcast goes bonkers and decides to kill every one. More harm than good would come of it.

Talk about overcompensation... high school shootings don't happen every day, there's no need for teachers to start dressing like Rambo.

What is 2 - (-2)?
First of all if teachers had guns id probably be dead. They shouldn't have them because they would be cappin kids for dumb ass reasons for example, kid and teacher are "arguing" and kid reaches into pocket teacher thinks "hes getting a gun/knife/ATOMIC BOMB!!! shit cap the kid!!"

