SFA Law subforum

[MohtasaUnique]

"I know from experience guyfriend" (because boyfriend would be gay) is not an apt reason to discredit a suggestion. If you have legitimate evidence as to how this will not benefit the forum, then post it. If not; quit spamming

Thanks kindly!

 

[Vin Diesel]

can you please tell me how that is not legitimate evidence? i mean i have had probably 17 times more expeirence with forums and such and then i see people like you trying to discredit my opinion because you claim that i have some sexual orientation that i am gay when it is probably you that are gay.

what is comes down to is that there is no point in amking a new section that would obviously get no activity because if there would be any activity on the subject it would already be in that forum, i would just be craeting extra and pointless work.,

 

[MohtasaUnique]

Have you stepped foot in SFA? There's plenty of activity. You're just upset and lashing out at me because you can't handle Spam Forum trolling *-*. Anyway you've clearly said your piece, and your... opinion is duly noted! Moving on

 

[Vin Diesel]

that is such a ignorant assumption to make i step foot in there while i have been lurknig and there is hardly any talk about law. Im, done with this argument because its clear that you can see that im right in that this will be a pointless section. but good luck getting this accepted.

 

[MohtasaUnique]

Infracted for spam, as I said you've stated your opinion, thanks very much. If you've taken time to read the entire thread, you would realize how redundant and how many times it's been refuted to say there's no law debate. So again; moving on!

 

[MohtasaUnique]

Bump for truth

 

[Noam]

I'll do it if somebody makes a form you HAVE to complete in order to OP or have thread locked. Otherwise it will just suck.

 

[MohtasaUnique]

^I was planning on doing just that





EDIT: A thought just occurred to me, based on what noamyoungerm said. I no longer think this will be a good idea. I stand by my points where the SFA forum would be greatly improved on if a different flavor of debate was introduced. However, I'm remembering the painstakingly long process we underwent in my delegation in order to pound out a legible bill that adheres to specifications close enough to be debatable. I feel no one is ready to devote this amount of time to a subforum that will likely start out at a very slow pace before it's able to pick up. Especially when frustration sets in as people refute your ideas, and strike your hard work with a simple "this bill won't work because X and Y", as everyone else without the capabilities to think for themselves agree by default.

In short, we're not devoted enough, nor open minded enough. This can be closed now

 

[n4n0]

Closed bud