Re:
As mentioned before, I did not deliver a refund directly. Over the course of several months of doing business there were sympathy discounts deducted from transactions. These discounts were literally offered in sympathy of the case that happened with "Go". For example: Glarex wanted to purchase an RSN for 1B RSGP. Instead the name was sold for 800M as compensation for his loss (200M price undercut). This is just an example of how the transactions that were done. There were several transactions that were done like this, however amounts weren't tracked because they were offered out of goodwill.
Over the course of repeat business and offering Glarex sympathy discounts he grew accepted with the loss of "Go" due to flipping profits which opportunities were made through me giving him names at a good price. Don't get me wrong - He spent a great deal of time and effort selling the names off to make his profits and I applaud him for doing a great job with it; but that doesn't change the fact that my prices were reduced for him before reselling or keeping the names for personal use.
To clarify what is being obliged of me here:
I am being asked to refund Glare, after I have already satisfied him by a means of offering RSGP sympathy discounts on transactions that have ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED. I don't think that the obligations you're requesting of me are fair and feel like you are asking me to provide a double discount due to the events that have already taken place.
If you'd like to share your conversation that you had with Glare on this subject I'm sure that the other members of staff will see that doesn't really care what happens from here out with regards to this because he's satisfied with the way I handled the situation a year ago. First and foremost, I’d never ask Glare to share any parts of your conversation with me that you guys have had, so I'm not sure how your conversation went, but Glare and I have open and honest communication, and he wouldn't tell me that he doesn't care about this anymore if he actually did. When I brought this up to him again last night, first of all I had to apologize to him for it being brought up again (since it’s already been dealt with), I asked him how he felt about it to this day since we haven't spoken about it for some time now. In summary he responded saying that he was surprised it's being brought up, because him and I have already sorted it out, and it's been over a year since I handled it with him.
Directed towards Dunworry: With all of this being said, and due to your persistence on this specific case; I feel like you are handling this from a biased standpoint to intentionally keep me away from the forums for personal reasons. I have heard several rumors revolving around the community that you consistently drag my name through dirt and warn users not to purchase from me. I don't mind that - I'm a banned user here and I wouldn't direct my customers to purchase from other banned users either unless I could definitely trust them. I hear about things through the grape-vine where you mention hateful things about me by MULTIPLE users. It honestly don't bother me on a personal level, I would just rather have this handled by someone that doesn’t share hateful remarks about me and that can respond to this on a less biased platform.
With all due respect to Dunworry and his position as a moderator, I would like to request that the situation with "Go" be reconsidered by another member of the Staff. I will be more than happy to clear up any other details with regards to this situation if need be. Please let me know if my obligations with regards to this situation change, and if restitution can be justified as it has already taken place.