hmm...
I would venture a guess that this clever dimwit wants people to download and run his client or to use some service that he offers. None of the things he mentioned have anything whatsoever to do with anything that he said. His wordmanship was classic. I cannot believe he actually talked about the 'pointer to the applet'... what's more, it's truly amazing that people fell / contemplated falling for it.
Is it possible to do the things that he says he is doing? I don't think so. Even if his <sarcasm>amazing</sarcasm> hack above actually changed anything on the client, it would do exactly dill on the server. The fact is, there is a server-side check for what I call mainRenderedFloorLevel when interaction commands are processed. It appears that all this scammer has done is cut-pasted some random assembly instructions and spewed some intelligent-sounding-speak in hopes that people would lend credibility to his statements.
Furthermore, his comments about network interception and an injected library into firefox have little to do with reality and more to do with what magicians call banter. Banter is used by magicians to lull the crowd into paying less attention to what their hands are doing and more attention to what is being said. This gives the magician the ability to perform the sleight-of-hand. Then, coupled with the prestige, the audience really thinks the magician performed magic. Just remember, in reality, magicians are charlatans.
Though network interception could give you access to the underlying packets. Once you have access to them, then what? Fantastic you have access to encrypted packets with ids that rotate synchronized between client and server. Best case scenario? You can give yourself a nice HUD of various in-game objects/npcs/items. Back when PVP was actually possible, this could have some fun implications, but could have been performed just as simply by injecting code into the client; no need for fancy schmancy assembly. Furthermore, the actual decrypted packet ids change from release to release. Defining the packets themselves from release to release is tedious. Finally, there are enough checks in the server-side logic to make hacks or exploits of this nature fairly useless. Speaking of fancy, schmancy, his crap-talk about assembly reminds me of one other thing. This app is run within a virtual machine. It would annoying to find that snippet he inanely pasted inside the running vm.
The guy is a moron trying to scam people.
For all those that are flaming OWS, shut the hell up.
He is the one of the best REAL hackers out there. Seriously, You think that injecting a library into a JAVA game, which doesn't have many loopholes is a mere glitch?
Get over yourselves.
None reads others posts, as reading others posts does't increase the number of postsElf, read my post.
If you are wondering how this is done, network interception within an injected library (into firefox). Thanks microsoft for createremotethread()
Oh My god , The castle wars thing is really impressive.
lol are u guys that much of idiots, its a ring of health glitch..... =/ done it like 5 times.
Lol? Owned?
What is a ring of health?
Why is it so important to you people that other people are "disproven"?
Not everyone has to believe what you do, who cares if he edited it?

