Oh god, haha, are you kidding? Get off your fucking high horse, holy shit.
Let me break this down:
Why?
You should really watch your footing here. Which reminds me, how do you pick staff again?
This doesn't even make sense, how could you even begin to make this claim?
And this is the -real- issue, and something I clearly suggested as being more available. Staff have never given a real reason as to why information is so secretive.
1) You're clearly an idiot that's trying to cause trouble. I answered your first question in what you quoted. Dumbass.
2) That is 100% public information. Stop being a dumbass.
3) Again. Dumbass.
4) Because it is. You want us to tell everyone exactly how we catch every ban evader and ever scammer and ever leaked? THE FUCK ARE YOU ON? OH LOL LETS TELL PEOPLE HOW WE CATCH THEM SO THEY CAN LEARN TO NOT GET CAUGHT LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Fucking dumbass. Stop wasting my time.
Only certain people are given staff positions. There could be a newcomer with 10x better ideas than staff or a whole group of people. You could say a percentage of the community is worse at making decisions than staff, but saying ALL staff are better at making decisions than regular users isn't correct. For example, I'm pretty sure half the people that DO NOT want moderator would be a lot better at making decisions that some staff at the moment. It's the staffs job to weed out bad decisions and collaborate with other staff, but you can't say that staff is better at making decisions than a regular user, that's just stupid.
Ideas are not decisions. This is why we have the suggestions forum. I never said all the staff are better at making decisions. I said that the community (implying the entire thing) is not as good as the staff (implying the entire thing) in making decisions. This is clearly a fact and if you can't accept that, then whatever. You can be wrong somewhere else.
