[DENIED] Removal of people advertising accounts as "no registered email"

Removal of people advertising accounts as "no registered email"
This is done with one purpose, implying the accounts cant be recovered by the OO which is a complete myth/lie and has been going on for over a year now, and lead to many many scams

all that is needed for the OO to recover a account is creation info.
i.e. creation date/ISP/Creation country/ first password

registered/non registered email does not make account anymore safe and advertising them as more safe is a lie.

They are EXACTLY the same. if the OO wants to they CAN recover.

although the statement is accurate, it should have no place in the account market section.

It is just a easy way for untrusted and new members to dump unsafe accounts.


Thoughts and feedback on the suggestion welcome <3

 

No support, it's just marketing talk. If we're going to forbid this, we might aswell forbid users saying:
- Trusted OO
- Cheapest
- TWC is for not posting from a home IP not for scamming
- Best
- Safest

It all depends on how an user interprets the sentence "no registered email".
People should just be more careful when buying things, when buying anything.
Most people are impulsive and want to trade people "quickly", this usually leads to them being scammed.

 

That's not a real argument tho
removing this would reduce the amount of these dodgy sales and gullible victims falling for it. believing these accounts are safe, no other term you have stated above has the same effect.

I can see a very solid positive to enforcing this or something similar
but very little draw backs.

Appreciate the response tho but you should at least think of the benefits i can see at least 5 scams in the past 2 months where people have fallen for this.

edit: and yeah it definitely is the impulsive ones who get caught, people not doing their research
but it is a gaming comunity you have to expect some gullible kids in the market section.

 

Support
These titles often misinform people, i get loads of people asking if my accounts have a registered email like it actually matters because of this, and it will often lead to not so bright people getting scammed.

 

I feel the same as Wortel on this one, educating users through stickies should be the aim instead imo.

 

How is it valid? I have never seen a benefit to it. I may have missed something?
If you could point out a case where this information is helpful to the buyer please let me know

There is no time difference or extra steps required for a scammer to recover the two versions (registered email vs unregistered)
all they have to do is click recover forgotten password no at email page and enter creation date->country->Internet service provider and first password and they have the account back.

the exact same process any scammer does post email transfer on other accounts.


but again just a discussion thread wanting to see what everyone else thinks

 

If players read the stickies then they should know all accounts can be recovered if registered email or not.

It does give the impression its safer, but then again no account is safe.

Personally ide rather buy an account with a non registered email address, based on the fact ide know that ide be then setting the 2nd password on the account it gives me peace of mind that the person im buying it from is the OO and not having to worry if its a flipped account.

I dont support this.

 

Your reply is the exact reason why i support chuckles post knowing that there are many more people like you who think that way

 

I support this. As it's a plain title implying to others that the account recovery is N/A possible. It's a marketing title helping new comers and commoners scam the newer generation.

 

I agree sometimes it can be used as a way to portray a "safer" trade, but on the other hand some people may look at it as a convenience tool, for example not having to worry about transferring the emails.

 

As an account seller, with actual 1000+accounts sold here and on pa+pb combined, i actually agree with this. It provides the customers with the misunderstanding that makes an account safe, when its always the person you buy from+if the account had a previous owner

 

I agree on wortels perspective but you cant interpret no reg email, its either with an email or not, and it adds 0 to the value of security, 100k traded or 500 vouches do add to it though, cause as i said only protection is the person you are buying from and wether he is oo

 

tbh "trusted oo" and "safest" would fit it aswell because it also gives false sense of security

 

yes hard to determine if its the safest out of the 250million accounts created on rs, but a meter of vouches, or amount traded doesnt seem to be a bad idea, links to vouches etc. It was always a good metric when it comes to acc purchases, but saying no email is set is like saying that u left the acc standing at a quest zone, doing a quest before u put it on sale(false sense of security)

 

The title imply's the account is not able to be recovered and which is a straight fact for that being false. People believe that it cant be and that is the reason of this post. To prevent common scamming upon sythe using the Title. It's not a mark of trust its a mark of saying ''Cant be recovered'' It's to protect the new generation not the old

 

Why?
out of curiosity