Rate the sig above you.

[Haunted]

If it's designed to be bad and you're not willing to give or take critism then do not post here.

 

[hampe-92]

I never said I can't take critism... I'm ok with 2/10 lolz
accualy i think it's not even that good...^^

 

[Haunted]

I meant give critism more then take critism people want to know what they can improve.
No hard feelings I did not want to sound that harsh but just point out that CnC is very important in these kind of threads.

 

[jCash]

tbh yours is to big and winds me up 1/10

 

[Haunted]

Your aware that I only count the main signature as a rating not the alba movie and the Logo of my designs right?

360x130 isn't really big buddy.

Can't rate yours, it doesn't work.

 

[BoxWood]

Your aware that I only count the main signature as a rating not the alba movie and the Logo of my designs right?

360x130 isn't really big buddy.

Can't rate yours, it doesn't work.

6/10, Not much depth, and not my kind of thing.

 

[Haunted]

Thanks some actual CnC.
Edit: But look closely there's alot of depth in this on as you can see Structures blurred and stuff. But hey, maybe I'm looking wrong?
Not really a signature to rate here.

 

[BoxWood]

Thanks some actual CnC.

Not really a signature to rate here.

Added one.

 

[Haunted]

I like it, a bit messy and to grungy, The lightsource is abit weird, It goes from light to dark in a few pixels on the left side, I'm not a fan of the border.

6/10 I like the whole effect it looks like an computer harddrive going insane but isn't really pleasing to the eye, and in the eyes of an real photoshop designer there are alot of little flaws.

 

[hampe-92]

7,5/10... I like the depth and the small details like the litle bird and the heart under her cheek, i don't know, but it makes me wanna look closer to see if there is more... maybe sounds strange but whatever.. thats what i think

 

[Evon]

5/10. I dont like the fact that it has a disclaimer, which obviously means their not proud of their work. Second, it's a white bg with brushes beveled/drop shadowed poorly with oddly placed Pacman images.

 

[hampe-92]

lolz xD thx for you comment im suprised you gave it a 5 after all... i would give it like, a 2

anyway... I like your sig, simple but i like it..what's that fonts name?
and btw... you're right, i'm not proud.. i made that image in like 2 min and nothing looks even close to good

 

[Leo.]

lolz xD thx for you comment im suprised you gave it a 5 after all... i would give it like, a 2

anyway... I like your sig, simple but i like it..what's that fonts name?
and btw... you're right, i'm not proud.. i made that image in like 2 min and nothing looks even close to good

2/10 simply becuz its animated lol

 

[hampe-92]

XD ok...
I like your, those teddybears are cute.. jk but i like the sig, just one thing, i think the T and leo text are a litle bit to dark...

 

[Deacon Frost]

0/10 cause... there's no substance to it.

 

[hampe-92]

what means substance?

 

[Leo.]

XD ok...
I like your, those teddybears are cute.. jk but i like the sig, just one thing, i think the T and leo text are a litle bit to dark...

it's pedo bear....

and deacon didn't make his im pretty sure so..

 

[hampe-92]

lolz ok.. how can u be so sure?
EDIT: just a question... wtf is a pedo bear? XD it doesn't sounds too good

 

[bizcuits21]

EDIT: just a question... wtf is a pedo bear? XD it doesn't sounds too good

Pedo bear is a magical bear that loves to rape little children.

You get a 3/10, took too long to actually even see the signature, and random brush strokes.

10/10 Simple but awesomely designed. (I WANT ONE!!!)

It's just a fractal on a black background.

 

[[Undecided]]

7/10

Kind of sloppy, and it's hard to make out what it is that's actually in the sig. It could be sharpened, and the text definitely needs improvement. Is that even text?



Edit: Mine will win. xD