Rate the sig above you.

[BoxWood]

7/10

Kind of sloppy, and it's hard to make out what it is that's actually in the sig. It could be sharpened, and the text definitely needs improvement. Is that even text?



Edit: Mine will win. xD

No sorry, It doesn't due to the fact that you shouldn't be using that rank.

-1/10 Etc.

 

[[Undecided]]

No sorry, It doesn't due to the fact that you shouldn't be using that rank.

-1/10 Etc.

9/10. Very original and nicely presented. It's very appealing to the eye.


Also; Why should I not be using that rank?

 

[bizcuits21]

7/10

Kind of sloppy, and it's hard to make out what it is that's actually in the sig. It could be sharpened, and the text definitely needs improvement. Is that even text?



Edit: Mine will win. xD

The sig is abstract, it is shapes I made in illustrator, combined with splatter brushes, alot of gradient maps, lots of random brush strokes, plastic wrap filter, a paper bag texture.

3/10 Honestly, its just a cropped image.....

 

[stankinrange]

How about in this thread you HAVE to post a signature in your actual post, instead of just rating peopls actual sigs, get some more variety and whatnot. and it'd be way easier..

anyways, heres mine:

 

[Kiabin]

6.5/10. Has a nice blend to it but kind of an offset render placement and hard to read text. Also kind of plain. And if this does become a big spam topic I'll be getting a moderator straight away. .

 

[duopperi]

7/10. It's a nice sig. I like sigs that have a more 3Dish effect to them, if that makes any sense.

 

[Solid tank]

10/10 pokesig fo' teh winz?

 

[TDD]

Hmm, let's all contradict a rule of stating no rating for sigs, with shitty ratings that do not truly reflect a sig's quality anyway.... i can haz FUCK OFF.

good day all.