Discussion in 'Gaming General' started by ProDuch, Jul 31, 2010.
We have a sub-forum for game discussion, moved.
I'm not sure how to rate it, i had the beta and didn't like it much. As a non-sc fan, 4.
Compared to SC1 it is way easier. It is more like Warcraft now, don't really need a high APM. But SC2 lived up to the hype, I'd give it a 10/10. Still some things need to be fixed and added but there will be a patch soon.
I thought it was ok for a while but got boring quick for me.
Played the beta, and now I cant wait to get it, and play some good UMS maps.
Can you say Dbz all sagas?
Definitely 10/10! I think it's quite intense in the same way SC1 was (1v1 multi that is).
10/10 most of the people hate it bc they get rushed.
i don't like the playing style..if it was more of a game where i was actually playing a character..and not moving an army around like chess..i'd play it.. but thats just me don't hate.
Yeah, these are the kind of reasons as to why I haven't bought starcraft 2 yet.
haha ling rush ftw.
I still have sc and brood war.
Did they do anything with the zerg/toss hybrids that are hidden in bw?
SC1 seems more basic and too the point strategy game. SC2 is more complicated and has units that are over powered. instead of armies there are small packs of enemies.
Sc2 = 10/10. Worth The Hype!!
7\10 It's a good game but i hate the 200 max unit limit....sure there is a good reason for that but they could of least give us the option to choose the limit.
I also don't like look of buildings. They all look the same to me and takes me ages to find out what building what is. (Maybe i have to get used to it)
Absolutely loved it when i played it @ my friend's dorm.