Rate my other Photo's! :D

[Xami]

Please rate out of /10

Thanks!

Thanks again !

 

[thatguy1234]

First one 6/10
Its nice quality and picture but it isnt as good as the first one I saw and seems repetitive.

Second 8/10
It has more detail and the one grass standing up adds to it. Its nice detail and tells more of a story because its from the ground looking into a bigger background.

Nice pictures and qualities but id like to see more, maybe of different scenes and different textures.

 

[T V]

I agree that the resolution is very nice, however... there's not much going on :huh:
The quality alone earns them a 5/10, but you could do a lot better with that sort of resolution!

 

Rather boring.
Try experimenting with what you're taking photos of.

 

[Process x]

I agree the pictures are nice but quite boring. Grass, really?

7/10 just because of how clear they are.

 

Never really saw the point of photography such as this.

3/10, nothing interesting occuring.

 

[Xami]

Thanks guys for the honest opinions!

What type of photo's do you guys think I should take?

 

[thatguy1234]

Thanks guys for the honest opinions!

What type of photo's do you guys think I should take?

Try taking photos of something that tells a story. A scene of some sort. This interests me the most because it makes me think about the scenario and all the millions of possible things that couldve happened to get the scene looking like this.

When you take pictures of grass its kind of killing itself. It doesnt leave the viewer with much to wonder about. Not saying nature is boring, but we see grass everyday. Nothing special about it or rare. Take pictures that are out of the norm and that will leave people thinking about not just the photo but the artist who captured the photo.

 

[Sieu Phan]

2nd one looks much better, 1st one kinda ugly no offense! so

1st 4/10
2nd 8/10

 

[Hungers]

I like the second one way better than the first one.
First one is pretty boring.

 

[llGoHardl]

Still, I think you should take pictures of something more eye popping or different. The second one is almost there but the first is really simple.

Pic 1: 7/10
Pic 2: 9/10

 

[idrinkgas]

1st: 5/10
2nd: 8/10

 

[Bert On Rice]

Having a really nice camera doesn't equate to images being good. At least it isn't black and white, or you would be a stereotypical kid "photographer."

Take pictures that actually mean something, not just some zoomed in close image of the tip of a plant with people in the back ground, or of the grass.


A general rule is, if it isn't a good picture with a bad camera, it isn't going to be a good picture with a good camera. Take these same images with an old nokia phone and see how interesting they are.

 

[DaeroN]

1st is 6 out of 10
2 is 8 out of 10
I think you are a good photographer keep up the good work

 

[Nothing Is Free]

8/10,

Crop them a little smaller next time >.>

 

[Rockerr]

Meh.
Very unoriginal plus you're location isn't that good. If you're going to take a close up blurry photo don't have people standing in the back, or a house. Also try photoshopping some of the colours.

 

[Bacterial]

10 out of 10

 

10 out of 10

uhm, lolwut.

Not sure how you reached that conclusion.

As Rockerr stated, using Photoshop or filters on your camera can help create a certain effect.

 

[Stevvy]

Probably 5/10 your focusing on the particular item is good, But its the item that is boring.
Change it around nobody wants to see a lettice.

 

[Smokerrrr]

1/10 man, wtf are you thinking, who would want to see something like that..