Rape-X Anti-Rape Female-Condom

[xestrox]

1) Okay, so now you're defending a rapist. And the rapist can make a choice - his penis or punishment for the crime he commited. Isn't the whole purpose of laws and punishments to make people face the consequences for their actions?
2) There is a plan for mandatory health and medical insurance across the US. Anyways, if the woman is at fault - she can be forced to pay the bills.
3) If the man is sober and the woman is drunk, it is by definition "rape" -- a drunk woman cannot give rational consent anyways [according to the law].

first of all im not defending a rapist, im defending the average joe, that sticks his penis into a girl for consentual sex and gets injured due to this. and it is not rape if the women got drunk on her own decision and then decided to have sex, don't redefine the law. also your saying we should pay taxes for women making mistakes that end in an injury to the innocent man.

xestrox, so what?
So what if all that happens? What right do you claim to have that allows you to tell other people what they can do with their bodies?

when it comes to the point it may indanger another person things do need controlled, are you saying i should be allowed to swing a sword around public as long as it may be used as protection? theres a reason there is laws on some things like what weapons you can carry around or which ou need a permit to. you are saying even if there is a great risk of an innocent person being harmed they should be aloud to do as they please,

do you feel child pornography should be legal? seeing as it's the child mollestors body and if he wishes to masturbate to it it would be his choice?

 

[Albania]

No it because if all women start to use it, their Vigina will expand and therefore making the penis not big enough.

Looks like a dildo to me..

http://www.flickr.com/photos/monikathomas/2764315560/

 

[Shredderbeam]

when it comes to the point it may indanger another person things do need controlled, are you saying i should be allowed to swing a sword around public as long as it may be used as protection?

As long as you don't hurt anybody else with it, sure. If you do, you'll probably be shot, so there's a fair incentive for you to avoid it.

theres a reason there is laws on some things like what weapons you can carry around or which ou need a permit to.

Greater government control, perhaps.

do you feel child pornography should be legal? seeing as it's the child mollestors body and if he wishes to masturbate to it it would be his choice?

Sure, a picture doesn't harm anybody. It's the unwilling abuse of children that's immoral, right?

Also, we're talking about a modified mousetrap in the vagina. We are not talking about guns, swords, nukes, or child pornography.

 

[Inventor]

The reason child pornography is illegal is because it weeds out the source which encourages it. If there's less demand, there's less problems.

Let's not digress.. It truly is a modified mousetrap in the vagina.

The rape aspect of it is justified but it is still a weapon. The main problem is it's potential for serious harm regardless of rape.

 

[jiexidluan]

lol.... wow.....
This has equal opportunities to protect as well as harm.
Seriously though...
Ok, so if a man tries to rape u(assuming u are a girl, cus im sure u dont want to stick one of these up ur ass) is it fair to essentially chop off his penis? No...

If you call it self-defense, its more than that. Its understandable to punch a person if they punch u back. or to shoot a person if they shoot at u, but this is like , i dont even fricking know. its like a guillotine for dicks.

This can be misused. People could start hiring hookers as assassins. The hooker puts one of they suckers into their V-Hole and goes to get the guy in bed. Im sure u wudnt refuse if some random hot girl started flirting with u then told u they wanted u to f()*k them. Then, off goes ur dick.

Now, the only way to remove these is surgically, which forces rapists to reveal themselves or risk losing their dicks. Well, what if this happened accidently somehow and was not anyways related to rape, or u had some serial dick cutter-offer assassin get one of these on u. How would the authorities be able to tell if you are a rapist or not? Bringing your girlfriend or wife and telling the authorities that you arent a rapist isnt neccesarily gunna work. How would they know that girl was really ur girl friend(obviously to prove your wife is really your wife you have papers)? It could be some random girl you paid to help you get out trouble for all the authorities know.

Well you say the abusers will be in legal trouble. Fair enough, its not like you can stop killers until they kill someone and are caught. Same for the dick chopping b1tches.

No. we do not have any right to tell people what to do with their bodies. But wtf is the difference between a dick chopping tampon and a knife? Essentialy it is a weapon you stick into your V-H0Le, except it makes more sense to insert a Rape-x than a knife pointed outward for obvious reasons.
So no, we cant tell people what to do with their bodies, but this has nothing to do with the fucking body, its a weapon. Regardless of when its in a girls V-Hole or not, IT IS A WEAPON. Well it wud be a rather suckish weapon when not inside a girl.
Well what happened to pepper spray?!?!? Its safer, doesnt chop dicks, can still be abused, and you could be framed as a rapists, but its more of a stunner than a killer.

Surgery to get it removed... Whose gunna pay? The Rapist? or the person who inserted the device.

Im sure this device would easily be found if checked for.
And im sure it could be just as easily removed.

Which leads us to, what stops a rapists from simpily pointing a gun to a girl and telling her to remove it? Well excuse is she doesnt have the applicator to remove it? He could just make her use her fingers (Yes, people are fucked up and would probably do it, especially if they are "smart" enuf to be a rapist)...

The device is concealed! What tells you to not drop a toaster into a bathtub while you're taking a bath in it? Ignore common sense for this exmaple. Obviously a big warning label wards you off from performing such stupid actions. Getting shocked to death would also teach you, not to do this, but thats kind of too late isnt it?
Basicly what im saying is that if this device is made to deter rapists, then why the hell does it not show some sort of warning to ward off rapists in the first place instead of making them get their dicks chopped off to find out.

I probably forgot the other points i had on this topic, i'll post back if i remember em.

Basicly, Yes, i support the idea of protecting women from rape.
No, i dont support it with this gay retard device.
If they make something thats more like pepper spray in a sense, i would give total support. but till then, I vote NO for dick chopping traps!

 

[ProudCheater]

I still cant believe it lol.

 

[Inventor]

lol.... wow.....
This has equal opportunities to protect as well as harm.
Seriously though...
Ok, so if a man tries to rape u(assuming u are a girl, cus im sure u dont want to stick one of these up ur ass) is it fair to essentially chop off his penis? No...

If you call it self-defense, its more than that. Its understandable to punch a person if they punch u back. or to shoot a person if they shoot at u, but this is like , i dont even fricking know. its like a guillotine for dicks.

This can be misused. People could start hiring hookers as assassins. The hooker puts one of they suckers into their V-Hole and goes to get the guy in bed. Im sure u wudnt refuse if some random hot girl started flirting with u then told u they wanted u to f()*k them. Then, off goes ur dick.

Now, the only way to remove these is surgically, which forces rapists to reveal themselves or risk losing their dicks. Well, what if this happened accidently somehow and was not anyways related to rape, or u had some serial dick cutter-offer assassin get one of these on u. How would the authorities be able to tell if you are a rapist or not? Bringing your girlfriend or wife and telling the authorities that you arent a rapist isnt neccesarily gunna work. How would they know that girl was really ur girl friend(obviously to prove your wife is really your wife you have papers)? It could be some random girl you paid to help you get out trouble for all the authorities know.

Well you say the abusers will be in legal trouble. Fair enough, its not like you can stop killers until they kill someone and are caught. Same for the dick chopping b1tches.

No. we do not have any right to tell people what to do with their bodies. But wtf is the difference between a dick chopping tampon and a knife? Essentialy it is a weapon you stick into your V-H0Le, except it makes more sense to insert a Rape-x than a knife pointed outward for obvious reasons.
So no, we cant tell people what to do with their bodies, but this has nothing to do with the fucking body, its a weapon. Regardless of when its in a girls V-Hole or not, IT IS A WEAPON. Well it wud be a rather suckish weapon when not inside a girl.
Well what happened to pepper spray?!?!? Its safer, doesnt chop dicks, can still be abused, and you could be framed as a rapists, but its more of a stunner than a killer.

Surgery to get it removed... Whose gunna pay? The Rapist? or the person who inserted the device.

Im sure this device would easily be found if checked for.
And im sure it could be just as easily removed.

Which leads us to, what stops a rapists from simpily pointing a gun to a girl and telling her to remove it? Well excuse is she doesnt have the applicator to remove it? He could just make her use her fingers (Yes, people are fucked up and would probably do it, especially if they are "smart" enuf to be a rapist)...

The device is concealed! What tells you to not drop a toaster into a bathtub while you're taking a bath in it? Ignore common sense for this exmaple. Obviously a big warning label wards you off from performing such stupid actions. Getting shocked to death would also teach you, not to do this, but thats kind of too late isnt it?
Basicly what im saying is that if this device is made to deter rapists, then why the hell does it not show some sort of warning to ward off rapists in the first place instead of making them get their dicks chopped off to find out.

I probably forgot the other points i had on this topic, i'll post back if i remember em.

Basicly, Yes, i support the idea of protecting women from rape.
No, i dont support it with this gay retard device.
If they make something thats more like pepper spray in a sense, i would give total support. but till then, I vote NO for dick chopping traps!

That was such an extended post I assumed it would be educated. Little did I know...

Wow. I can't even respond to that aside from requesting you spell words like you as I'm sure this isn't your second day on the interweb.

 

[Iced Man]

That is seriously fucked up. Cutting off a guys part.. No no, thats no good

 

[DropKick Murphys]

That is seriously fucked up. Cutting off a guys part.. No no, thats no good

So you would tell women that they are not allowed to use this?

 

[BoxWood]

Aslong as it reduces the number of rapes, I have no issue with it.

 

I don't have a problem with if it reduces rape rates, but I doubt it would really help. Rapists could check if there's one in (Using a metal detector or physically via his eyes).

I also see a lot of potential law suits / possible jail time for assault(s).

 

[RS Greatest]

nope it sounds too dangerous
but on the other hand, it reduce rape but then would it actually?
for example, lets say that a few men did get the dick chopped off, then it be all over the news then everyone will know and watch for it
a guy can easily check...

 

[Alteranz]

what i dont understand is how females can store a whole flippin weapon that shoots tranquilizer or has 4 knives in it up there vagina and still be comfortable at parties....???

 

[25packbeer]

ya i can see it now when she is trying to take it out BAM no finger... in my opinion not a smart idea

 

[Alteranz]

and also, is there an ejecting system? or does the old crusty chopped up penis stay inside her? That would be almost as bad as rape...

 

[Range Me]

wtf!! hell no..What happens if she gets wasted and trys to fuck a guy?? the guy's dick gets chopped off?

 

[The Riddler_]

ya i can see it now when she is trying to take it out BAM no finger... in my opinion not a smart idea

and also, is there an ejecting system? or does the old crusty chopped up penis stay inside her? That would be almost as bad as rape...

That is seriously fucked up. Cutting off a guys part.. No no, thats no good

wtf!! hell no..What happens if she gets wasted and trys to fuck a guy?? the guy's dick gets chopped off?

This is all described in the earlier posts. I mean, can you guys at least scan over the previous posts before you just randomly post your uninformed opinion?

-Non permanent damages: The device uses "hooks" that grab onto the penis, but do not go deep enough to affect anything that affects function. It HURTS A LOT, but it doesn't cause any structural or functional damage - just slight discoloration.

-Still prevent rape: It may not prevent rape entirely, but it would at least take some careless rapists off the street - and just give the woman a feeling of safety and security when she's home alone. If you knew, as a potential rapist, that the woman may have something in her vagina that would hurt your penis A LOT and you couldn't remove it yourself, wouldn't you think twice?

-Leaves the women to safety after "Deployment": The man's penis is grabbed by this device, and the immense pain he feels overtakes the "rationality" receptors which would cause him to further hurt the woman. He has to try to quell the pain, and naturally the way one would expect to do this is by removing the device - he will soon realize this is an impossible task, but the victim will be long gone and he will be apprehended because of the device.

-Doesn't hurt the women while it's inside her: The design can be found on the website: www.Rapestop.net. They have quite a good answer to this piece of criticism, basically saying that it's how the device functions that prevents accidental injury from happening. It has been tested.

-Isn't visible (not noticeable from close up): Absolutely not! It fits behind the labia and has no strings or anything protruding [taken from Rapestop.net FAQ]. You can't see behind the labia

-Won't malfunction: Of course, any product has the risk of malfunctioning. However, the harm done by these malfunctions shouldn't be a reason for the women not to be able to purchase them. It's all about risk vs. reward, and according to the products' creators, there is quite little risk with quite a high reward.

I hope these answers helped I mean obviously, there will be some drawbacks at first. Eventually, however, this product might become more and more developed until [ideally, but impractically] it is finally able to stop rape entirely, while not harming innocent people.

And yes, I totally agree that people need to read the thread before posting

 

[xestrox]

As long as you don't hurt anybody else with it, sure. If you do, you'll probably be shot, so there's a fair incentive for you to avoid it.



Greater government control, perhaps.



Sure, a picture doesn't harm anybody. It's the unwilling abuse of children that's immoral, right?

Also, we're talking about a modified mousetrap in the vagina. We are not talking about guns, swords, nukes, or child pornography.

Actually the reason i mentioned the child pornography was for a reaso as you can see if you read my previous post clearly, aswell as sure there are going to be laws to prosecute and punish a person, but does that mean we should support people breaking the law, just because they may end up punished in the end?

 

[Shredderbeam]

Actually the reason i mentioned the child pornography was for a reaso as you can see if you read my previous post clearly, aswell as sure there are going to be laws to prosecute and punish a person, but does that mean we should support people breaking the law, just because they may end up punished in the end?

I didn't say that we should support people breaking the law.

There is nothing wrong with the device inherently - the moral evil results from an individual willingly using the device to harm others.

 

[xestrox]

I didn't say that we should support people breaking the law.

There is nothing wrong with the device inherently - the moral evil results from an individual willingly using the device to harm others.

yes, it does result from an individual willingly using the device to harm others, that's why im saying that releasing this device is handing a women the oppurtunity to harm an innocent male, that is why i feel this should be restricted from release because the benefits are overruled by the negative uses, seeing as there are a very small amount of positive things about this, because the rapist when harmed by the device is going to excell in violence against the woman.