Questioning 2 infractions

[Kratom]

Hi, I would like further explanation on legitimacy of last 2 infractions I got some time ago.

1) http://sythe.org/showthread.php?p=10255137#post10255137
Spam. Really? Am I not allowed to question a shady website's legitimacy and warn others of the possible implications? Please post the rule behind this.

2) http://sythe.org/showthread.php?p=10185844#post10185844
Spam. I was pointing out that the guide is obvious and is public knowledge, which it was even at that point. I can link posts on sythe and elsewhere that explain the trick. The thread even was locked but I still got infracted?

Thanks.

 

[KerokeroCola]

http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=842041

There's no need to publicly dispute them. DJweasel issued them, so PM him. Since he's a global, if you aren't satisfied after talking with djweasel, you'll need to PM a general admin (Nick, FireZ, and Verts).

 

[KerokeroCola]

By the way, we value niceness and humbleness above anything else. Even if the infractions were unwarranted, an angry PM won't do you any good. Sometimes I reverse incorrect infractions just to replace them with a "Flaming a Moderator" infraction because of the excess swear words in respond PMs. We volunteer mods do our best to not make mistakes, but we are merely human beings like yourself.