thequestionmark
Apprentice
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 883
I think I just found the nail in the coffin.
THIS is EXACTLY the account he was trying to sell to me.
http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=446820
At first Dorito offered, then he was supposed to be MM of that trade... then at the end, the account was to be given away...
Yet he's selling it(fishy no?)? Assuming he bought it, I also asked if he was 110% sure that the account WON't be recovered. I asked him how long he had it, and he responded something along the lines of "a while".
How can an account anyone's possessed for a few mere days be considered "SAFE?!" to sell?
I would also like to say that those logs are entirely fake. I know there is no definitive proof for this (I've zoomed in, appears that he has a hacked client or is a good photoshoper), but would like to point out 3 things.
1. "Crucial" overlook: Check the sources of all my pictures in the evidence post. Most recently, I've been using only PHOTOBUCKET to source my images. This is not to say I haven't ever used Imageshack on Sythe, but after I've registered an account on Photobucket, don't you find it fishy that I'd use Imageshack for 1/8 pieces of "framed" evdience? Moreso, Dorito has been the one using imageshack, not me.
2. Motive. What got him banned is exactly what's called into question. Scammer or not, I'm not an idiot.
3. Writing style: Pointed out by SMR.
Props to SMR and R2Pleasent for pointing out 2 and 3.
Edit: Now that these discrepancies have been pointed out, he asks you to disregard his previous post.
Qmark
EditX2: He went online, I messaged him regarding these logs. His response
"it also wasn't that hard to message me talking weird, and then know when i posted them you could just deny it
"
http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x28/daveim/dorito8.jpg
If I knew he was going to post them, why would I have said it? I do realize that MSN ss's from this point cannot be seen as valid, as SOMEONE *Dorito COUGH*, is a very good editor.
Furthermore, given my alleged skills at conversation editing, why would I have bothered to use the somewhat circumstantial evidence provided? It's a good thing he posted in my previous scammer report, stating that as far as he could tell, NOTHING was fake.
Yea, and Martha Steward didn't go to jail. When the probability of a heist getting caught is low and requires circumstantial evidence, things happen
THIS is EXACTLY the account he was trying to sell to me.
http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=446820
At first Dorito offered, then he was supposed to be MM of that trade... then at the end, the account was to be given away...
Yet he's selling it(fishy no?)? Assuming he bought it, I also asked if he was 110% sure that the account WON't be recovered. I asked him how long he had it, and he responded something along the lines of "a while".
How can an account anyone's possessed for a few mere days be considered "SAFE?!" to sell?
I would also like to say that those logs are entirely fake. I know there is no definitive proof for this (I've zoomed in, appears that he has a hacked client or is a good photoshoper), but would like to point out 3 things.
1. "Crucial" overlook: Check the sources of all my pictures in the evidence post. Most recently, I've been using only PHOTOBUCKET to source my images. This is not to say I haven't ever used Imageshack on Sythe, but after I've registered an account on Photobucket, don't you find it fishy that I'd use Imageshack for 1/8 pieces of "framed" evdience? Moreso, Dorito has been the one using imageshack, not me.
2. Motive. What got him banned is exactly what's called into question. Scammer or not, I'm not an idiot.
3. Writing style: Pointed out by SMR.
Props to SMR and R2Pleasent for pointing out 2 and 3.
Edit: Now that these discrepancies have been pointed out, he asks you to disregard his previous post.
Qmark
EditX2: He went online, I messaged him regarding these logs. His response
"it also wasn't that hard to message me talking weird, and then know when i posted them you could just deny it
"
http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x28/daveim/dorito8.jpg
If I knew he was going to post them, why would I have said it? I do realize that MSN ss's from this point cannot be seen as valid, as SOMEONE *Dorito COUGH*, is a very good editor.
Furthermore, given my alleged skills at conversation editing, why would I have bothered to use the somewhat circumstantial evidence provided? It's a good thing he posted in my previous scammer report, stating that as far as he could tell, NOTHING was fake.
Dorito said:
Yea, and Martha Steward didn't go to jail. When the probability of a heist getting caught is low and requires circumstantial evidence, things happen
Yea, kind words for someone who allegedly made "fakes" of you, and had the staff in the what was it... in the "palm of his hands"? Or, did you "forget"?Dorito said: