U
Unregistered x0
Guest
To my understanding, the concept of this newly-appointed high pardon board is to revisit a past offense, take into consideration what the member has to say- and then make a judgment call that is not weighed down by elements of the offense... but rather to accept that the person has changed, or decline because there is no change present.
It is safe to say that all administrators understand how progression works, and that the underlining factor within progression is time, specifically. Four years to be precise, four years have gone since my offense- and PART of that offense was denying that it happened, that was a part of it. To strip me of my pardon because four years ago i would not admit to this offense is in my eyes unjust. SMR can vouch that i refunded my victim, even after accepting the ban.
I am admitting to my past crime here- right now. I am admitting to denying this crime FOUR years ago- this is my confession. If my pardon is declined because of the offense i made, doesn't that essentially defeat the constructive purpose?
I do not recall previous disputes, perhaps i had a change of heart and fought to stay during my last days, but this should all be associated with my entity four years ago and not who i am today.
At least dignify me with an actual, wholesome decline. It's human nature to deny an offense after it initially takes place- that is why i haven't publicly admitted to anything for half a decade. If i was depriving you all of my past nature entirely then that would be deceit and grounds for disapproval, but i have been completely open.
If you are completely concrete with your decision and wish not to make this a huge spectacle then i would sincerely appreciate it if you were to accept my msn request Pen- i've added you and would like to briefly exchange words.
It is safe to say that all administrators understand how progression works, and that the underlining factor within progression is time, specifically. Four years to be precise, four years have gone since my offense- and PART of that offense was denying that it happened, that was a part of it. To strip me of my pardon because four years ago i would not admit to this offense is in my eyes unjust. SMR can vouch that i refunded my victim, even after accepting the ban.
I am admitting to my past crime here- right now. I am admitting to denying this crime FOUR years ago- this is my confession. If my pardon is declined because of the offense i made, doesn't that essentially defeat the constructive purpose?
I do not recall previous disputes, perhaps i had a change of heart and fought to stay during my last days, but this should all be associated with my entity four years ago and not who i am today.
At least dignify me with an actual, wholesome decline. It's human nature to deny an offense after it initially takes place- that is why i haven't publicly admitted to anything for half a decade. If i was depriving you all of my past nature entirely then that would be deceit and grounds for disapproval, but i have been completely open.
If you are completely concrete with your decision and wish not to make this a huge spectacle then i would sincerely appreciate it if you were to accept my msn request Pen- i've added you and would like to briefly exchange words.
